A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "No Bias in the Baseline Act" seeks to modify how budget baselines are calculated. It amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to define the baseline based on current laws and the assumption that discretionary appropriations remain at current levels. The bill removes certain existing provisions regarding how laws providing direct spending and receipts are treated. Additionally, it mandates that no adjustments be made for inflation or other factors in these calculations. Finally, it requires the CBO to include alternative fiscal scenarios in its reports.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The mandate for the CBO to include alternative fiscal scenarios provides more comprehensive data to the public.
- Scored +2
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
The requirement for the CBO to include alternative fiscal scenarios increases transparency regarding different fiscal possibilities.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -3
Does this strengthen Social Security?
The bill modifies the Social Security Act by striking a subparagraph, which may affect how program projections are handled.
- Scored -2
Would retired people be better off under this?
The modification of the Social Security Act and the removal of inflation adjustments could negatively impact long-term social safety net projections.
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
The removal of inflation adjustments and changes to how emergency requirements are treated may obscure the true long-term debt trajectory.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Increased Transparency through Alternative Scenarios: Under Section 3, the CBO would be required to include alternative fiscal scenarios in its reports. This could provide more information to the public and officials regarding different financial possibilities.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Removal of Inflation Adjustments: Per Section 2(a)(3), the bill states that no adjustment shall be made for inflation or any other factor. This could impact the accuracy of long-term budget projections as economic conditions change.
-
Changes to Resource Designations: Section 2(a)(3)(A) modifies the baseline to exclude resources designated as an emergency requirement and any resources provided in supplemental appropriation laws. This change alters how the current year's budget is projected.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The mandate for the CBO to include alternative fiscal scenarios provides more comprehensive data to the public.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this strengthen Social Security? — The bill modifies the Social Security Act by striking a subparagraph, which may affect how program projections are handled.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would retired people be better off under this? — The modification of the Social Security Act and the removal of inflation adjustments could negatively impact long-term social safety net projections.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — The requirement for the CBO to include alternative fiscal scenarios increases transparency regarding different fiscal possibilities. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — By excluding supplemental and emergency resources from the baseline, the bill may underrepresent projected government spending levels. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — The removal of inflation adjustments and changes to how emergency requirements are treated may obscure the true long-term debt trajectory.
- 4/29/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.