A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Presented to President.
On the President's desk
Passed both chambers in the same form and has been sent to the President.
The President has ten days, not counting Sundays, to sign it or send it back. Doing nothing lets it become law — unless Congress adjourns in that time, in which case doing nothing kills it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed House voice vote
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- To President
No one's position on it was recorded: the House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together), and the Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote).
The President’s ten days to sign it or veto it ended on Monday, October 26, and the record does not yet say what happened. Congress.gov can take a few days to record a signature or a veto.
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Criminal History Access Act of 2026. It allows peace officer standards and training agencies to get access to criminal history records. The Attorney General is required to exchange these records and information with authorized officials, including these agencies. The bill also defines what a peace officer standards and training agency and a State mean. Finally, it gives the Attorney General 180 days to update specific regulations to carry out the act.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +5
Does this change how police departments operate?
The bill aids peace officer standards and training agencies in setting standards for the hiring, training, and ethical conduct of law enforcement officers by providing access to criminal history records.
- Scored +2
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill explicitly includes Indian tribes in the scope of entities with which the FBI can exchange records, aiding tribal law enforcement oversight.
- Scored +2
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill facilitates the administrative functions of state training agencies regarding law enforcement standards.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2(a)(1): This provision allows peace officer standards and training agencies to access criminal history records and information. This could be positive because it helps these agencies properly check the background of individuals when setting standards for the hiring, training, ethical conduct, and retention of law enforcement officers.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline potential negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill explicitly includes Indian tribes in the scope of entities with which the FBI can exchange records, aiding tribal law enforcement oversight. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Enhanced police standards and training oversight can positively impact communities disproportionately affected by policing. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Enhanced police standards and training oversight can positively impact communities disproportionately affected by policing. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Enhanced police standards and training oversight can positively impact communities disproportionately affected by policing. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Enhanced police standards and training oversight can positively impact communities disproportionately affected by policing.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill aids peace officer standards and training agencies in setting standards for the hiring, training, and ethical conduct of law enforcement officers by providing access to criminal history records. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill enhances oversight of law enforcement agencies that impact racial equity through better standards and record access.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill facilitates the administrative functions of state training agencies regarding law enforcement standards.
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
What changed from Referred in Senate: No change to the wording. Only the printed details that record the bill’s progress, such as the heading and dates, are different.
- 10/14/2026
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Presented to President.
- 9/30/2026
- Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5299)
- 5/13/2026
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 5/12/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3370-3371)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3370-3371)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 8352.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3370-3372)
- Mr. Schmidt moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- 5/4/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-636.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 553.
- 4/22/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 4/16/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina