Bill Huizenga (R-MI)
Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026
A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors · See all 21 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026 aims to protect United States national security and economic interests from foreign adversaries. It specifically targets "model extraction attacks" where entities attempt to steal technical features from closed-source, American-owned AI models. The bill seeks to identify, punish, and deter these attacks by entities of concern, such as those in the People's Republic of China or the Russian Federation. It mandates comprehensive assessments by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Commerce to identify these threats. The legislation also establishes a public "AI Model Extraction Attackers List" to name offending individuals and entities. Finally, it provides the President with authority to impose sanctions and blocking of transactions against identified entities of concern.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +7
Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer?
The bill directly targets the theft of proprietary technical characteristics to protect intellectual property rights.
- Scored +6
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?
The bill protects against digital model extraction which is a component of broader cybersecurity and technical integrity.
- Scored +6
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill protects the proprietary interests and competitive edge of U.S. private sector companies.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Intellectual Property and Economic Interests: The bill aims to protect the intellectual property rights and economic competitiveness of United States companies whose AI models are targeted by unauthorized acquisition of capabilities (Section 2).
-
National Security Safeguards: By deterring model extraction attacks, the bill seeks to prevent foreign adversaries from using "short cuts" to acquire advanced AI capabilities, thereby protecting national security and foreign policy interests (Section 2).
-
Support for Legitimate Research: The Act explicitly clarifies that authorized model training practices that follow terms of service remain a legitimate research method, ensuring that research is not unfairly targeted (Section 2, Section 3).
-
Information Sharing for Defense: The bill establishes an information-sharing mechanism so that AI model owners can voluntarily and confidentially share information about attacks with the Department of Commerce to improve defense (Section 4).
-
Public Awareness of Threats: The creation of the "AI Model Extraction Attackers List" and the publication of best practices provide transparency regarding specific entities and methods used in attacks (Section 4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Economic Restrictions through Sanctions: The President has the authority to block and prohibit all transactions involving property and interests of identified entities of concern, which could impact various economic activities (Section 5).
-
Potential for Entity Listing: Entities identified as conducting model extraction attacks or using fraudulent networks may be added to the Department of Commerce's Entity List (Section 5).
-
Broad Definitions of Entities of Concern: The definition of "entity of concern" includes any foreign person or entity operating under the direction or control of a country of concern, which may impact a wide range of foreign actors (Section 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer? — The bill directly targets the theft of proprietary technical characteristics to protect intellectual property rights. Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — The bill introduces new regulatory/punitive tools for tech entities involved in model extraction.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The bill protects against digital model extraction which is a component of broader cybersecurity and technical integrity. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The bill encourages a diplomatic strategy leveraging U.S. allies and partners to detect AI theft.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands presidential authority to block transactions and regulate entities of concern. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates a publicly available list of attackers and a published report of best practices.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill protects the proprietary interests and competitive edge of U.S. private sector companies.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — By protecting intellectual property and competitive advantages in AI, the bill supports long-term economic growth.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/8/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/29/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/22/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Eric CrawfordRepublican · Arkansas
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
John JamesRepublican · Michigan
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin