A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Next Gen Road Safety Act," proposes an amendment to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. It seeks to change how COPS grants can be used by law enforcement agencies. Specifically, the bill would authorize these grants to be used for the procurement of certain equipment. This equipment is intended to help agencies prevent and de-escalate high-speed vehicular pursuits. Examples of such equipment include vehicle-disabling systems, police bumper systems, and drones.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +3
Would people in cities be better off under this?
Urban areas often experience high-speed chases; de-escalation tools increase safety for residents.
- Scored +3
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
De-escalation tools increase safety for road users in rural high-speed corridors.
- Scored +3
Does this change how police departments operate?
The bill provides tools to de-escalate high-speed chases, potentially reducing police-involved accidents.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
Increased use of drones by law enforcement may negatively impact individual privacy.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Prevention and de-escalation of high-speed vehicular pursuits: Law enforcement agencies would be authorized to use COPS grants to procure equipment, technology, or support systems to assist in preventing and de-escalating high-speed vehicular pursuits. (Section 2)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — De-escalation tools increase safety for road users in rural high-speed corridors. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban areas often experience high-speed chases; de-escalation tools increase safety for residents. Would children be better off under this? — Improved road safety from fewer high-speed chases potentially protects children. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Reduction in high-speed pursuit accidents improves safety for road users. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Reduction in high-speed pursuit accidents improves safety for road users. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Reduction in high-speed pursuit accidents improves safety for road users.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill provides tools to de-escalate high-speed chases, potentially reducing police-involved accidents.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — The authorization of drones for law enforcement could marginally increase domestic surveillance capabilities.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill modifies federal grant eligibility (COPS grants) provided to local agencies. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Increased use of drones by law enforcement may negatively impact individual privacy.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Laurel LeeRepublican · Florida
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida