Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA)
To amend title 10, United States Code, and the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, to codify and clarify gender neutral standards for members of certain Armed Forces, and for other purposes.
A Democratic bill with 38 Democratic cosponsors · See all 38 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
H.R. 8175 aims to establish and clarify gender-neutral standards for members of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force. The bill prohibits excluding members from assignments, career fields, or occupational specialties based on gender. It requires the Secretary of Defense to provide annual reports on occupational standard changes and member separations. Additionally, the bill modernizes occupational performance standards to be based on a scientifically rigorous process. It also mandates the submission of a review regarding the operational effectiveness of Army and Marine Corps ground combat units.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +10
Would women be better off under this?
Removes gender-based barriers to military assignments and career fields, significantly increasing opportunity.
- Scored +10
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
Explicitly prohibits the exclusion of military members from any assignment or career field based on gender.
- Scored +7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
Mandates annual reports to Congress on occupational standard changes and involuntary separations.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Equal Opportunity for Assignments: Members of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Space Force cannot be kept out of a career field, occupational specialty, or assignment because of their gender. (Section 1(a)(1))
-
Scientifically Based Standards: Occupational performance standards must be determined using a "scientifically rigorous process" that considers technical, tactical, cognitive, and physical abilities. (Section 1(b)(1)(A)(ii-iii))
-
Informed Health Standards: Any prescribed standards must be based on input from Department of Defense researchers and health care providers. (Section 1(b)(1)(A)(iii))
-
Increased Accountability: The Secretary of Defense must report annually on the number of members involuntarily separated or reclassified, providing the specific reasons for these actions. (Section 1(a)(1)(b)(2-3))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals are explicitly listed in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — Removes gender-based barriers to military assignments and career fields, significantly increasing opportunity. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Promotes a gender-neutral approach to professional military standards. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Expands career opportunities for young adults entering military service regardless of gender. Would men be better off under this? — Shifts standards to a scientifically rigorous process based on ability rather than gender assumptions.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — Explicitly prohibits the exclusion of military members from any assignment or career field based on gender. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — Promotes gender-neutral standards and prohibits exclusion based on gender in military assignments.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Mandates annual reports to Congress on occupational standard changes and involuntary separations.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Requires a scientifically rigorous process for determining occupational performance standards.
- 10/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/6/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/2/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 34 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Herbert ConawayDemocrat · New Jersey
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Rick LarsenDemocrat · Washington
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Christian MenefeeDemocrat · Texas
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Nancy PelosiDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Patrick RyanDemocrat · New York
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California