A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 706.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the Taxpayer Workforce Modernization Act, requires the Internal Revenue Service to set up a fellowship program to recruit private-sector data scientists. These data scientists will partner with tax law specialists to tackle complex tax administration issues, improve data quality, and build advanced analytics. The program will establish a task force to help with audit case selection, train junior employees, and address offshore tax evasion. Fellows will serve terms of two, four, or three years, with options for extensions and potential permanent hiring. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue must also submit an annual report to Congress analyzing the program's effects and return on investment.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +3
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?
Increases the IRS's capability to perform advanced surveillance and quantitative modeling on taxpayers.
- Scored +2
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Provides career opportunities for young data scientists via fellowships.
- Scored +2
Would students be better off under this?
Creates pathways for specialized graduates in data science to enter government service.
The opposite· 3 of 7
- Scored -8
Would billionaires be better off under this?
Billionaires are the primary targets for the 'most complex' tax cases and offshore evasion task force.
- Scored -7
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?
Directly targets complex tax avoidance and offshore assets used by the ultra-wealthy.
- Scored -6
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
Explicit focus on offshore evasion and complex cases heavily targets this group.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(e)(5): This provision requires the task force to identify, mentor, and train junior IRS employees on using data analytics and emerging techniques. This is positive because it helps build a more skilled federal workforce.
-
Section 2(e)(4): The task force is directed to support efforts addressing offshore tax evasion and issues related to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act using data integration and anomaly detection. This is positive because it aims to catch hidden overseas tax evasion.
-
Section 2(i): The Commissioner must submit an annual report to Congress detailing the program's effects and return on investment, including calculations of costs and benefits. This is a positive accountability measure for the people to see if the program works.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 2(g)(2): Fellows will be paid at a rate no less than the minimum rate payable for GS-15 of the General Schedule and up to the annual compensation specified in section 102 of title 3, United States Code. This could be viewed as a negative burden if taxpayers feel the salary range for these temporary fellows is too high.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would students be better off under this? — Creates pathways for specialized graduates in data science to enter government service. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Provides career opportunities for young data scientists via fellowships. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Billionaires are the primary targets for the 'most complex' tax cases and offshore evasion task force. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Directly targets complex tax avoidance and offshore assets used by the ultra-wealthy. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Explicit focus on offshore evasion and complex cases heavily targets this group. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Increased audit targeting for complex cases and offshore evasion specifically targets high-income earners. Would business owners be better off under this? — Increased use of advanced analytics for audit selection may increase scrutiny of business filings.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Aims to reduce improper tax payments through data-driven recommendations. Does this raise taxes on the highest earners? — Improved detection of offshore tax evasion and complex tax cases likely increases collection from high-net-worth individuals. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Potential for increased federal revenue through more effective audit selection and detection of tax evasion. Is this likely to create jobs? — Creates at least 10 high-paying fellowship positions for data scientists.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Increased use of advanced analytics and transaction-level testing may reduce taxpayer privacy.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — Increases the IRS's capability to perform advanced surveillance and quantitative modeling on taxpayers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Strengthens the enforcement capabilities of a federal agency (IRS). Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires annual reporting to Congress on the program's costs and benefits. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The use of anomaly detection and network analysis increases government scrutiny of individual financial data.
- 9/8/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-807.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 706.
- 7/1/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 16.
- 3/18/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced in House