Warren Davidson (R-OH)
Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026
A Republican bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026 implements various reforms regarding foreign intelligence surveillance authorities and how the government handles electronic communications and personal data. It introduces strict protections against warrantless searches of domestic communications, location information, web browsing records, and vehicle data. The bill implements new data retention limits and prohibits federal law enforcement from purchasing personal data from data brokers. Additionally, it establishes enhanced oversight, transparency, and accountability measures through Inspector General audits and declassified reports. Finally, the legislation aims to modernize privacy standards and strengthens protections for whistleblowers.
Yes· 3 of 18
- Scored +9
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The bill provides extensive new protections for personal digital information and prohibits warrantless acquisition of data.
- Scored +8
Does this give people more control over their personal data?
The bill significantly strengthens privacy protections for electronic communications, web browsing, location data, and vehicle telematics through warrant requirements.
- Scored +7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates declassification of significant surveillance decisions and enhances annual reporting requirements.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection Against Warrantless Queries: The bill prohibits government officers from accessing covered information in response to certain queries without specific exceptions, such as emergency situations or consent (Section 101).
-
Protection of Domestic Communications: It prohibits federal officers from intentionally acquiring communications where both the sender and recipients are in the U.S. without a warrant, except in specific emergencies (Section 405).
-
Warrant Protections for Digital Records: The bill provides warrant protections for location information, web browsing records, and search query records (Section 601).
-
Privacy for Vehicle Data: It prevents federal law enforcement from accessing "covered vehicle data" from noncommercial vehicles without a warrant, unless specific consent or emergency conditions are met (Section 701 and 731).
-
Limitations on Information Use: It limits the ability to use information obtained under section 702 of FISA in criminal, civil, or administrative proceedings (Section 102).
-
Prohibition of Reverse Targeting: The act prevents the government from intentionally targeting individuals outside the U.S. for the significant purpose of acquiring their specific information (Section 103).
-
Data Retention Limits: It establishes procedures to ensure that collected information is destroyed within five years unless specific legal exceptions apply (Section 104 and 406).
-
Protection of Personal Data from Brokers: It prohibits federal law enforcement agencies from purchasing personal data from data brokers in exchange for anything of value (Section 201).
-
Enhanced Judicial Oversight: The bill expands the appointment of experts, including those with privacy, civil liberties, and technical expertise, to assist the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Section 307).
-
Increased Transparency: It mandates the declassification of significant decisions, orders, and opinions, and requires unclassified portions of surveillance reports and Inspector General audits to be made available to the public (Section 308, 404, 501, and 507).
-
Improved Accuracy in Applications: It requires specific procedures to ensure that applications for court orders are accurate and complete (Section 303).
-
Increased Accountability through Audits: It requires Inspectors General to conduct audits of court order applications to ensure safeguards are in place to keep information accurate (Section 501).
-
Stronger Whistleblower Protections: It expands whistleblower protections to include communications made to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (Section 502).
-
Restrictions on Technical Assistance: The bill requires the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to supervise demands for technical assistance from service providers to ensure they are necessary and narrowly tailored (Section 105).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Emergency Access: While providing exceptions, the strict documentation and reporting requirements for emergency access to information could potentially slow down response times during urgent situations (Section 101).
-
Emergency Exceptions to Warrant Requirements: In emergency situations involving imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm, officials may acquire data before obtaining a warrant, provided they follow certain notification steps (Section 405 and 2731).
-
Limitations on Intelligence Acquisition: The prohibition on acquiring certain datasets could impact the ability of the intelligence community to conduct certain operations, subject to specific exceptions (Section 404).
-
Restrictions on Technical Assistance: New requirements for demonstrating necessity and narrow tailoring for technical assistance may create additional hurdles for intelligence gathering (Section 105).
-
Limited Data Retention Exceptions: Certain information may be kept longer than the 5-year limit if it is subject to preservation obligations in legal proceedings or specific investigations (Section 406).
-
Potential for Implementation Delays: The Attorney General has the authority to delay the implementation of certain provisions for up to one year to allow for technical setup or staff training (Section 903).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would high-income households be better off under this? — The bill enhances digital privacy protections for all individuals. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The prohibition on data broker sales provides additional privacy protections for all citizens regardless of wealth. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill increases privacy protections for personal digital and vehicle data. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill's privacy protections apply broadly to all citizens including those with disabilities. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill provides heightened privacy protections for digital interactions prevalent in urban environments. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes oversight requirements regarding the use of intelligence authorities for protected classes including race. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes oversight requirements regarding the use of intelligence authorities for protected classes including race and national origin. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes oversight requirements regarding the use of intelligence authorities for protected classes including race and national origin. Would men be better off under this? — The bill provides increased privacy protections that apply to all individuals regardless of gender. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes oversight requirements regarding the use of intelligence authorities for protected classes including race and national origin. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes oversight requirements regarding the use of intelligence authorities for protected classes including race and national origin. Would women be better off under this? — The bill provides increased privacy protections that apply to all individuals regardless of gender.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The bill provides extensive new protections for personal digital information and prohibits warrantless acquisition of data. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates declassification of significant surveillance decisions and enhances annual reporting requirements.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — The bill significantly strengthens privacy protections for electronic communications, web browsing, location data, and vehicle telematics through warrant requirements.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill restricts federal law enforcement from purchasing personal data from third-party brokers without a warrant. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill requires reports on the use of intelligence authorities regarding protected classes including race and ethnicity.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The bill allows for exceptions to query protections when used for defensive cybersecurity purposes.
- 3/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
4 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HR-9016: Email Privacy Act
- 119-S-4082: Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026
- 119-S-4649: Email Privacy Act
- 119-S-4739: A bill to implement reforms relating to foreign intelligence surveillance authorities, to prohibit reverse targeting of United States persons and persons located in the United States, and for other purposes.
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio