Kelly Morrison (D-MN)
Warrior Infertility Act
A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the ``Warrior Infertility Act'', seeks to amend title 38 of the United States Code. The primary goal is to include infertility as a condition that is presumed to be incurred or aggravated by toxic exposure. This would apply to individuals during active military, naval, air, or space service. The legislation involves redesignating existing paragraphs within the code to accommodate this change.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +8
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The bill directly benefits veterans by recognizing infertility as a service-connected condition due to toxic exposure.
- Scored +7
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The bill expands veteran benefits by including infertility as a condition presumed to be caused by toxic exposure during service.
- Scored +5
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill establishes a presumption of service connection for infertility, which can facilitate easier access to related healthcare and benefits.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Presumption of Connection to Service: By including infertility as a condition presumed to be incurred or aggravated by toxic exposure, the bill provides a specific classification for service members (Section 2). This could benefit individuals by establishing a legal link between their service and infertility.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill directly benefits veterans by recognizing infertility as a service-connected condition due to toxic exposure. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The expanded benefits may provide necessary financial assistance to low-income veterans facing infertility.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill expands veteran benefits by including infertility as a condition presumed to be caused by toxic exposure during service.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill establishes a presumption of service connection for infertility, which can facilitate easier access to related healthcare and benefits.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Establishing service connection for infertility may provide financial support to veterans facing reproductive health challenges.
- 3/5/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Herbert ConawayDemocrat · New Jersey
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California