Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)

Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026

H.R. 7836 · House bill Immigration

A Democratic bill with 15 Democratic cosponsors · See all 15 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the "Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026," proposes the creation of the United States Immigration Courts as an independent court of record under article I of the Constitution. The system would consist of an appellate division, a trial division, and an administrative division. It establishes specific appointment processes, 15-year terms for judges, and a structured hierarchy including chief judges. The act also outlines jurisdiction for both trial and appellate divisions, establishes salary standards, and defines retirement and removal protocols. Furthermore, it provides mechanisms for temporary judges and facilities to handle caseload needs.

Yes

  • Scored +7

    Would immigrants be better off under this?

    The bill benefits immigrants by establishing an independent judiciary, providing legal orientation, and ensuring access to qualified interpreters.

  • Scored +6

    Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?

    The bill enhances due process by establishing an independent immigration court system with standardized judicial qualifications and legal orientation programs.

  • Scored +5

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    The bill provides financial hardship protections by allowing for the waiver of court fees.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.