Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI)
Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act
A Republican bill with 7 Democratic cosponsors · See all 22 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act," proposes an amendment to section 1960(a) of title 18, United States Code. The primary goal is to change the language regarding what constitutes a crime under that specific section. It seeks to include those who exercise control over currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +3
Would business owners be better off under this?
Provides legal protections and clarity for business owners operating blockchain platforms.
- Scored +3
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
Enhances due process by requiring specific proof of control over funds for criminal liability.
- Scored +2
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Likely to benefit young entrepreneurs and developers in the blockchain and fintech space.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this give the federal government more power?
Slightly limits federal prosecutorial power by adding a required element to a criminal statute.
- Scored -1
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?
Decreases the likelihood of criminal liability for tech developers who do not control the funds.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific positive outcomes or benefits for individuals or groups of people explicitly described in the provided text.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The amendment to section 1960(a) of title 18, United States Code, expands the scope of the law to include anyone who "exercises control over currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency." This change could impact individuals based on how they interact with various forms of value as defined in the amendment.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Provides legal protections and clarity for business owners operating blockchain platforms. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Likely to benefit young entrepreneurs and developers in the blockchain and fintech space.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Provides greater legal clarity for blockchain startups by refining the requirements for criminal liability. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Potential for economic growth through the fostering of blockchain technology innovation. Is this likely to create jobs? — Promoting blockchain innovation may lead to increased tech sector job growth.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Enhances due process by requiring specific proof of control over funds for criminal liability. Does this give the federal government more power? — Slightly limits federal prosecutorial power by adding a required element to a criminal statute.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this shorten or soften prison sentences? — Refines the legal standard for money laundering charges to require actual control over funds, potentially preventing overreach.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — Decreases the likelihood of criminal liability for tech developers who do not control the funds.
- 10/29/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/26/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Tom EmmerRepublican · Minnesota
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Julia LetlowRepublican · Louisiana
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas