A Democratic bill with 18 Democratic cosponsors · See all 18 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Healthy Hair Act" seeks to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. It would classify any hair straightening or smoothing product, including keratin treatments, that contains any amount of formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasing substances as adulterated. The bill also provides a specific definition for these hair products. Additionally, it mandates a health impact study to be conducted by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs. This study will look into the health risks of exposure, specifically focusing on salon workers and potential associations with cancer, respiratory issues, and endocrine disruption.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill enhances consumer protection by classifying potentially harmful hair products as adulterated.
- Scored +5
Does this put more money into scientific research?
The bill funds a study on the health impacts of formaldehyde exposure.
- Scored +5
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill expands the regulatory reach of the FDA regarding hair products.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill may negatively impact salon owners and businesses that rely on these products.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Product Safety Classification: By amending Section 601 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the bill classifies hair straightening or smoothing products containing formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasing substances as adulterated (Section 2(a)). This could prevent these specific products from being introduced into interstate commerce after the 180-day grace period.
-
Scientific Research and Awareness: The bill requires a study on the short-term and long-term health impacts of exposure to these products (Section 3(a)). This study aims to investigate impacts on salon workers and the association of exposure with cancer, respiratory issues, and endocrine disruption (Section 3(a)(1)-(2)).
-
Regulatory Recommendations: The Commissioner of Food and Drugs is tasked with providing recommendations for regulatory action to limit health impacts and enforcement (Section 3(b)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill enhances consumer protection by classifying potentially harmful hair products as adulterated.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The bill funds a study on the health impacts of formaldehyde exposure.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands the regulatory reach of the FDA regarding hair products.
- Healthcare
- Does this put more money into medical research? — The bill mandates a scientific study into the health impacts of formaldehyde exposure in hair products.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill may negatively impact salon owners and businesses that rely on these products.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey