Troy Nehls (R-TX)
Aviation Innovation and Global Competitiveness Act
A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The Aviation Innovation and Global Competitiveness Act aims to update the Federal Aviation Administration type certification process. It seeks to support the development of new and novel technologies to ensure United States leadership in aviation. The bill requires the FAA Administrator to publish a plan for improving the issue paper process and creating stable policy. It also mandates the establishment of standard expected timelines for various certification milestones. Additionally, the Act calls for updated delegation guidance and specific criteria for FAA issue papers.
Yes· 3 of 12
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
Aviation industry players benefit significantly from more predictable and stable certification timelines.
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates that the FAA publish certification plans and performance metrics on its official website.
- Scored +4
Is this likely to grow the economy?
Enhancing aviation innovation and global leadership can contribute to broader economic growth.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
By explicitly stating that new timelines are not subject to judicial review, it limits legal recourse for applicants.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Aviation Innovation: The bill seeks to support the development of new and novel technologies, including advanced air mobility, to ensure global leadership in aviation (Section 2; Section 3).
-
Improved Transparency and Predictability: The Administrator is required to create a plan for stable policy regarding subjects commonly addressed in issue papers and establish standard expected timelines for major milestones in the certification process (Section 2).
-
Increased Efficiency in Certification: The bill directs the FAA to improve efficiency and timelines by converting stable means of compliance issue papers into published policy or advisory circulars (Section 3).
-
Clearer Delegation Guidance: The Act requires updated guidance regarding applicant eligibility for delegation and the classification of compliance findings as routine or safety-critical (Section 4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Exclusion of Complex Safety Issues from Timelines: The establishment of standard expected timelines does not apply to complex issues that the Administrator determines present an unsafe condition (Section 2).
-
Limited Legal Recourse: The establishment of standard expected timelines does not create any new legal rights, and the Administrator's adherence or failure to adhere to these timelines is not subject to judicial review (Section 6).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — Enhancing aviation innovation and global leadership can contribute to broader economic growth. Is this likely to create jobs? — By streamlining certification for new technologies, the bill may indirectly support job growth in the aviation sector. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Increased predictability in the certification process may benefit smaller aviation technology firms. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The focus on safety-critical standards ensures consumer protection remains central to innovation.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Aviation industry players benefit significantly from more predictable and stable certification timelines. Would union members be better off under this? — The bill requires consultation with the certified bargaining representatives of aviation safety staff.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates that the FAA publish certification plans and performance metrics on its official website. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill reinforces the FAA's regulatory role by mandating specific new planning and reporting processes. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — By explicitly stating that new timelines are not subject to judicial review, it limits legal recourse for applicants.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — By updating certification processes, the bill encourages the practical application of scientific aviation research.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — Development of advanced air mobility provides new options for future public transit infrastructure. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Support for advanced air mobility could lead to more efficient and potentially greener transportation technologies.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this make trade with other countries easier? — Maintaining aviation leadership can improve the U.S. competitive stance in international trade.
- 9/15/2026
- Subcommittee on Aviation Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 5/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/13/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
- 2/12/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin