Lauren Boebert (R-CO)
Rural Jobs and Hydropower Expansion Act
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 676.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
The Rural Jobs and Hydropower Expansion Act seeks to amend the Reclamation Project Act of 1939. Its primary goal is to encourage non-Federal hydropower development regarding Bureau of Reclamation projects. The bill makes several technical changes to how hydropower is defined and handled in relation to Bureau of Reclamation facilities. It modifies language regarding conduits and works facilities to broaden the scope of hydropower use. Additionally, it provides new instructions regarding how authorizations issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are maintained or renewed.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +4
Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?
The bill expands the types of Bureau of Reclamation facilities that can be used for hydropower, facilitating more renewable energy development.
- Scored +3
Would business owners be better off under this?
The expansion of hydropower facility eligibility creates more opportunities for non-Federal energy developers.
- Scored +3
Is this likely to create jobs?
The bill encourages non-Federal hydropower development by expanding the scope of eligible Bureau of Reclamation facilities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Broadened Hydropower Development: By changing the language from "small conduit hydropower" to "hydropower using all Bureau of Reclamation facilities," the bill expands the types of facilities that can be used for such development (Section 2, paragraph 2).
-
Clarified Authorization Longevity: The bill specifies that authorizations issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission remain in place until they become inactive, and allows for renewals as permitted by the Commission (Section 2, paragraph 8).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Shift in Jurisdiction: Once a project site authorization becomes inactive, the jurisdiction of the project site shifts exclusively to the Bureau of Reclamation (Section 2, paragraph 8).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — The bill expands the types of Bureau of Reclamation facilities that can be used for hydropower, facilitating more renewable energy development. Does this invest in rural communities? — The focus on hydropower development via Bureau of Reclamation projects can support economic and energy infrastructure in rural areas.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The expansion of hydropower facility eligibility creates more opportunities for non-Federal energy developers. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Increased hydropower development through Bureau of Reclamation projects can provide energy and economic benefits to rural communities.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill encourages non-Federal hydropower development by expanding the scope of eligible Bureau of Reclamation facilities. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — By broadening the definition of eligible hydropower facilities, the bill facilitates easier access for non-Federal entities to develop energy projects.
- 8/27/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-775.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 676.
- 5/14/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 14.
- 2/11/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Adam GrayDemocrat · California