A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "HIRE DEA Act," aims to provide direct hire authority to the Attorney General. This authority would allow for the appointment of qualified candidates to various positions within the Drug Enforcement Administration. These appointments can be made for work in locations the Attorney General deems necessary to support the Administration's mission. This authority applies to fiscal years 2027 through 2034. The bill targets specific roles to help combat drug trafficking activities.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?
The bill empowers the Attorney General to quickly hire personnel to combat drug trafficking activities, which supports efforts to address the drug crisis.
- Scored +4
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill grants the Attorney General direct hire authority to bypass standard civil service hiring procedures for DEA positions.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill allows for hiring without regard to standard civil service hiring provisions established under Title 5 of the United States Code.
- Scored -2
Does this change how police departments operate?
The bill allows the Attorney General to bypass standard federal hiring provisions for certain positions, which could reduce standard oversight in police recruitment.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Staffing for Law Enforcement: The Attorney General can appoint qualified candidates to covered positions such as program managers, project managers, criminal investigators, intelligence analysts, forensic specialists, and community outreach coordinators to support the Administration's mission (Section 2(a) and Section 2(b)).
-
Adaptability to New Threats: The Attorney General has the authority to determine that any other position is necessary based on emerging drug trafficking trends or threats (Section 2(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Removal of Standard Hiring Procedures: The Attorney General may appoint personnel without regard to certain provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code (Section 2(a)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — The bill empowers the Attorney General to quickly hire personnel to combat drug trafficking activities, which supports efforts to address the drug crisis.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill grants the Attorney General direct hire authority to bypass standard civil service hiring procedures for DEA positions.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The bill allows for hiring without regard to standard civil service hiring provisions established under Title 5 of the United States Code.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill allows the Attorney General to bypass standard federal hiring provisions for certain positions, which could reduce standard oversight in police recruitment.
- 2/9/2026
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Kevin KileyIndependent · California
Brad KnottRepublican · North Carolina