Lucy McBath (D-GA)
Family Violence Prevention and Services Improvement Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 49 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Family Violence Prevention and Services Improvement Act of 2026," aims to amend the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act to improve services and interventions for victims. It focuses on advancing the primary and secondary prevention of family, domestic, and dating violence. The legislation provides for increased support for States, Indian Tribes, and underserved populations through various grant programs. It specifically enhances resources for national hotlines, including new digital services and a specific national Indian domestic violence hotline. Additionally, the bill establishes specialized resource centers for Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian communities.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +9
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill significantly strengthens support for Indian Tribes, including a national Indian domestic violence hotline and specific resource centers.
- Scored +7
Would women be better off under this?
The bill enhances resources and protections for victims of domestic and dating violence, which disproportionately affects women.
- Scored +7
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill establishes new resource centers and grant programs specifically for Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and other underserved racial or ethnic populations.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Access to Services for Victims: The bill aims to improve services and interventions for victims of family, domestic, and dating violence through local programs that are trauma-informed and culturally relevant (Section 101).
-
Increased Support for Indian Tribes: The act strengthens the capacity of Indian Tribes to exercise sovereign authority to respond to violence committed against Indians (Section 101).
-
Enhanced Resources for Underserved Populations: New grant programs are established to assist communities in organizing resources to address violence experienced by underserved populations (Section 313B).
-
Improved Hotline Accessibility: The bill expands national hotlines to include digital services, making it easier for people to access support through electronic communication platforms (Section 313).
-
Targeted Support for Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Communities: The bill authorizes the creation of specific resource centers to reduce disparities for these communities (Section 111).
-
Protection of Victim Privacy: The bill requires grantees to protect the confidentiality and privacy of persons receiving assistance (Section 302A(b)).
-
No Financial Barriers to Assistance: The law prohibits imposing income eligibility standards or levying fees for assistance or services supported by these funds (Section 302A(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Requirement for Documentation for Coalitions: Tribal Domestic Violence Coalitions must provide documentation of their history and ability to conduct specific activities to be eligible for grants (Section 311A(c)).
-
Limitations on Grant Duration: Many of the specialized grant programs, such as those for underserved populations and culturally specific services, are limited to specific timeframes, such as 3 or 5 years (Section 313B(5), Section 313C(e)).
-
Conditional Funding for Hotlines: Payments for the national Indian domestic violence hotline are subject to annual approval by the Secretary and the availability of appropriations (Section 313A(c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill significantly strengthens support for Indian Tribes, including a national Indian domestic violence hotline and specific resource centers. Would women be better off under this? — The bill enhances resources and protections for victims of domestic and dating violence, which disproportionately affects women. Would children be better off under this? — The bill prioritizes services for children and youth exposed to violence and includes specialized services for abused parents and their children. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill mandates accessible digital formats and specialized training for assisting people with disabilities. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill includes funding for teen dating violence prevention demonstration projects. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill prohibits charging fees or requiring income eligibility for assistance services. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes grants for underserved racial or ethnic populations which often include Black communities. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill provides funding for underserved racial and ethnic populations through specialized grants. Would retired people be better off under this? — The bill includes specific mentions of protecting elderly persons from family violence. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill includes protections for elderly persons within the definition of family violence.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill establishes new resource centers and grant programs specifically for Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and other underserved racial or ethnic populations. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The bill enhances services for victims with disabilities, including providing information in accessible formats and training personnel. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill prohibits imposing income eligibility standards or fees for assistance to victims.
- Healthcare
- Does this make mental health care easier to get? — The bill funds the response of mental health and substance use disorder systems to victims of violence.
- Education And Technology
- Does this get reliable internet to more people? — The bill expands national hotlines to include digital services via electronic communication platforms.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Secretary to make evaluation reports from prevention programs publicly available on the HHS website.
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/17/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 6/29/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/18/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 6/11/2026
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- 20 Cosponsors added.
- 2/3/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Young KimRepublican · California
Kimberlyn King-HindsRepublican · Northern Mariana Islands
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Frank MrvanDemocrat · Indiana
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Lauren UnderwoodDemocrat · Illinois
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida