A Republican bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 12 cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 691.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Clarity for Compensation Act. It amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to give a specific exemption from the definition of a broker. This exception applies to certain personal services entities that are owned by a registered representative. The bill sets strict rules regarding how these personal services entities can receive compensation on behalf of the representative. It also outlines requirements for oversight, recordkeeping, and dispute resolution for these entities. The provisions of this Act take effect 180 days after the date of its enactment.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
Directly benefits owners of personal services entities by exempting them from being classified as brokers.
- Scored +3
Would high-income households be better off under this?
Beneficial for registered representatives who use personal services entities for compensation.
- Scored +3
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
Beneficial for high-earning registered representatives and their families.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2 introduces an exception under Section 3(a)(4)(G) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which allows a personal services entity to receive compensation on behalf of a registered representative without being classified strictly as a broker, provided specific conditions are met. This could make it simpler for registered representatives to manage their business compensation through their own personal entities.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 2 includes detailed regulatory and recordkeeping burdens under Section 3(a)(4)(G)(ii), requiring personal services entities to maintain and make available all books and records that the Commission or self-regulatory organizations determine necessary. This could create extra administrative work and compliance responsibilities for those entities and the people who own them.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Directly benefits owners of personal services entities by exempting them from being classified as brokers. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Beneficial for registered representatives who use personal services entities for compensation. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Beneficial for high-earning registered representatives and their families. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Beneficial for high-earning registered representatives and their families.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Provides a regulatory exemption for personal services entities owned by registered representatives, reducing their regulatory burden. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Ensures customers have a mechanism to recover funds from personal services entities through dispute resolution forums.
- 9/1/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-791.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 691.
- 7/6/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/30/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 51 - 0.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Young KimRepublican · California
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Gregory MeeksDemocrat · New York
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina