James Baird (R-IN)
To amend the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2026, to delay the implementation of amendments made by such Act to the hemp production provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946.
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill aims to change the timeline for implementing certain hemp production rules. It proposes an amendment to the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2026. Specifically, it targets changes made to the hemp production provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. The bill seeks to replace a 365-day implementation period with a 3-year period.
Yes
- Scored +4
Would business owners be better off under this?
The extended timeline offers business owners in the hemp industry more time to adjust their operations to new regulatory requirements.
- Scored +4
Would farmers be better off under this?
Farmers involved in hemp production benefit from a longer transition period before new provisions take effect.
- Scored +3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill provides hemp producers more time to adapt to new regulations by extending the implementation period to three years.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
Delaying the implementation of hemp production amendments may delay the enforcement of new environmental or production standards.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Extended Implementation Timeline: By striking
365 days'' and inserting3 years'' in Section 781, the bill provides a longer period before certain hemp production amendments must be implemented.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Delayed Implementation: The amendment to Section 781 changes the period from 365 days to 3 years, which delays the implementation of amendments made to the hemp production provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The extended timeline offers business owners in the hemp industry more time to adjust their operations to new regulatory requirements. Would farmers be better off under this? — Farmers involved in hemp production benefit from a longer transition period before new provisions take effect.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill provides hemp producers more time to adapt to new regulations by extending the implementation period to three years.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Delaying the implementation of hemp production amendments may delay the enforcement of new environmental or production standards.
- 5/20/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
- 1/12/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
James ComerRepublican · Kentucky
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina