Lance Gooden (R-TX)
Foreign-Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 9 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the ``Foreign-Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025'', seeks to clarify tariff treatments for merchandise within United States foreign-trade zones. It aims to support U.S. competitiveness in manufacturing and distribution while creating and preserving jobs. The legislation amends the Foreign Trade Zones Act to allow certain articles and their components to enter free of duty. Specifically, it targets merchandise subject to duty deferral restrictions under the USMCA. The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection is tasked with issuing necessary regulations within 90 days of enactment.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +5
Is this likely to create jobs?
The bill explicitly aims to create and preserve jobs by enhancing manufacturing competitiveness.
- Scored +5
Does this make trade with other countries easier?
Enhances trade efficiency between the US and its USMCA partners by clarifying duty-free treatments.
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
Provides cost-saving duty deferral benefits for manufacturing and distribution businesses.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Manufacturing and Jobs: The stated purpose of the Act is to ensure foreign-trade zones support United States competitiveness in manufacturing and distribution and to create and preserve jobs in the United States (Section 2).
-
Duty-Free Merchandise: Certain articles and their components that are manufactured or changed in condition within a foreign-trade zone can enter free of duty when withdrawn for direct exportation to a USMCA territory (Section 3(a) and Section 3(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill explicitly aims to create and preserve jobs by enhancing manufacturing competitiveness. Is this likely to grow the economy? — By reducing duty barriers for USMCA exports, the bill seeks to boost U.S. manufacturing and distribution competitiveness.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this make trade with other countries easier? — Enhances trade efficiency between the US and its USMCA partners by clarifying duty-free treatments. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Strengthens trade relationships within the USMCA framework.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Provides cost-saving duty deferral benefits for manufacturing and distribution businesses. Would union members be better off under this? — Aims to preserve jobs within the U.S. manufacturing sector.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — Facilitates smoother trade of goods between USMCA treaty partners. Does this give the federal government more power? — Maintains federal control over customs and trade regulations via CBP.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Vern BuchananRepublican · Florida
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Virginia FoxxRepublican · North Carolina
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Mike KellyRepublican · Pennsylvania
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina