Greg Landsman (D-OH)
Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act
A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 25 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act. It orders the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to hold a technical conference within 90 days. This conference must include the Department of Energy, public utilities, state regulators, ratepayer advocates, and large loads like artificial intelligence data centers. The goal is to talk about strategies and rate structures to protect everyday families and small businesses from paying higher energy costs caused by these large loads. After the conference ends, the Commission has 180 days to send a report with recommendations and best practices to specific committees in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
It aims to protect residential consumers from energy price volatility and increased costs.
- Scored +3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Protecting residential rates helps prevent disproportionate energy cost burdens on low-income families.
- Scored +3
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
The bill aims to shield middle-income residential ratepayers from increased costs.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Protection from higher energy bills: Section 2(a) requires a conference specifically focused on finding strategies and rate structures to protect residential and small commercial ratepayers from increased costs tied to large loads like AI data centers. This could help everyday people keep their utility bills manageable.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline potential negative impacts, consequences, or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Small commercial owners may benefit from more stable or protected energy rate structures. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Protecting residential rates helps prevent disproportionate energy cost burdens on low-income families. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill aims to shield middle-income residential ratepayers from increased costs.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — It aims to protect residential consumers from energy price volatility and increased costs. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill seeks to protect small commercial ratepayers from rising energy costs driven by large data centers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — It empowers the FERC to examine and report on rate structures used by large loads. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — It requires a public report to Congress following a technical conference.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — While not direct regulation of tech companies, it addresses the energy impact of AI data centers.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/27/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
- 7/20/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/8/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/9/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey