A Republican bill with 7 Democratic cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill aims to amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit the captivity of American mink. It specifically targets mink raised in captivity for fur production. Under this act, the transport, sale, breeding, or possession of these animals or their products would be prohibited. However, certain exceptions are carved out based on the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981. The legislation also includes a provision for the Secretary to seek the purchase of privately owned mink farms.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill promotes animal welfare by prohibiting the captivity of mink used for fur.
- Scored +2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill expands federal authority by prohibiting certain interstate commerce and directing a federal buy-out.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -5
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill restricts the ability of mink farm owners to conduct their primary business activity.
- Scored -3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill restricts the commerce of mink, which negatively impacts businesses in the fur industry.
- Scored -2
Would farmers be better off under this?
While it offers a buy-out, it effectively eliminates the mink farming industry.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Ending Mink Captivity for Fur: The bill prohibits the transport, sale, breeding, or possession of American mink raised for fur production (Section 2, subsection a). This would effectively end the practice of keeping these animals in captivity for the fur industry.
-
Financial Exit for Farmers: The Secretary is directed to seek to purchase privately owned mink farms (Section 2, subsection c, paragraph 1). This provides a potential way for farm owners to transition out of the industry.
-
Fair Valuation for Farm Buy-Outs: When offering to purchase a farm, the Secretary must consider the farmer's most recent s-year average of mink owned and the infrastructure value of the farm (Section 2, subsection c, paragraph 2). This ensures the purchase offers are based on specific farm metrics.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Commerce and Ownership: The bill prohibits people from transporting, selling, acquiring, or possessing American mink raised for fur production (Section 2, subsection a). This places a direct prohibition on those currently involved in the mink fur industry.
-
Dependence on Government Funding: The buy-out of mink farms is subject to the availability of appropriations (Section 2, subsection c, paragraph 1). This means the ability for farmers to sell their farms to the government is not guaranteed if funds are not available.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill restricts the ability of mink farm owners to conduct their primary business activity. Would farmers be better off under this? — While it offers a buy-out, it effectively eliminates the mink farming industry. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The prohibition of mink farming may negatively impact rural economies dependent on this trade.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill restricts the commerce of mink, which negatively impacts businesses in the fur industry.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill promotes animal welfare by prohibiting the captivity of mink used for fur.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal authority by prohibiting certain interstate commerce and directing a federal buy-out.
- 9/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lance GoodenRepublican · Texas
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia