A Republican bill with 11 Democratic cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Honor Our Living Donors Act," seeks to amend the Public Health Service Act. Its primary purpose is to stop the consideration of an organ recipient's income when providing reimbursements to donating individuals. The legislation also changes the requirements regarding the expectation of payments by organ recipients. Additionally, it establishes a new requirement for an annual report from the Secretary. This report must detail whether grant funding was adequate to reimburse all donating individuals for qualifying expenses.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires the Secretary to prepare and make public an annual report regarding the adequacy of funding for organ donor reimbursements.
- Scored +3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
By decoupling reimbursements from the recipient's income, the bill protects the donor's ability to receive full reimbursement even if the recipient has a low income.
- Scored +3
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The bill ensures that individuals providing organs can be reimbursed for expenses without their compensation being impacted by the financial status of the person receiving the organ.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reimbursement Neutrality: Under Section 2, the bill dictates that the income of the organ recipient shall not be considered when a grant recipient provides reimbursement to a donating individual. This ensures that the recipient's financial status does not factor into the reimbursement process.
-
Increased Oversight: Section 4 requires the Secretary to prepare and make public an annual report. This report must include whether grants provided adequate funding to reimburse all donating individuals for qualifying expenses, as well as the estimated number of individuals who did not receive full reimbursement and the total funding necessary to achieve full reimbursement.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Changes to Payment Expectations: Section 3 amends Section 377(e) of the Public Health Service Act by striking paragraph (3) and modifying the language of paragraphs (1) and (2). The text provided does not explicitly detail the specific nature of the paragraph being removed or the resulting change in expectation.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — By decoupling reimbursements from the recipient's income, the bill protects the donor's ability to receive full reimbursement even if the recipient has a low income. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill ensures that individuals providing organs can be reimbursed for expenses without their compensation being impacted by the financial status of the person receiving the organ.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Secretary to prepare and make public an annual report regarding the adequacy of funding for organ donor reimbursements.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill helps ensure organ donors are reimbursed for qualifying expenses regardless of the recipient's income, which may support the stability of organ donation programs.
- 10/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina