A Democratic bill with 60 Democratic cosponsors · See all 60 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Lowering Drug Costs for American Families Act" expands the drug price negotiation program by increasing the number of drugs subject to negotiation from 20 to 50. It extends the drug price negotiation program to include drugs in the commercial market via group health plans and individual health insurance. The bill also mandates that prescription drug inflation rebates apply to drugs furnished in the commercial market. Additionally, it establishes specific out-of-pocket limits for prescription drugs under private health insurance. Finally, the act requires coverage of selected insulin products without a deductible and with capped cost-sharing.
Yes· 3 of 28
- Scored +9
Does this lower the price of prescription medicines?
The bill increases the number of drugs subject to negotiation and mandates cost-sharing limits for insulin.
- Scored +7
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill lowers essential drug costs and insulin costs which disproportionately helps low-income earners.
- Scored +7
Would retired people be better off under this?
The bill expands drug price negotiations which provides significant savings for older populations.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill may increase costs for group health plans and health insurance issuers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Negotiation Power: The bill increases the number of drugs subject to the negotiation program from 20 to 50 (Section 101(a)). This could provide more opportunities for negotiated prices on a wider variety of drugs.
-
Expanded Drug Price Negotiations to Commercial Market: The program would apply to participants, beneficiaries, or enrollees under group health plans or individual health insurance coverage (Section 101(b)). This expands the reach of price negotiations beyond just Medicare.
-
Lower Out-of-Pocket Costs for Insurance Holders: The bill establishes annual out-of-pocket limits for prescription drugs under group health plans and individual coverage (Section 301(b)(1)). For self-only coverage, the limit on prescription drug out-of-pocket cost-sharing would be $2,000 for plan years beginning in 2027 (Section 301(b)(2)(A)(i)).
-
Affordable Insulin Access: For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, health plans must provide coverage for selected insulin products without applying a deductible (Section 302(a)(1)). Furthermore, cost-sharing for these insulin products is capped at the lesser of $35 per 30-day supply or 25 percent of the negotiated price (Section 302(a)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Insurance Opt-Outs: Health insurance issuers or group health plans can affirmatively elect not to participate in the drug price negotiation program for specific drugs or periods (Section 101(d)(1)(2)).
-
Public Disclosure of Nonparticipation: Any insurance issuer or plan that chooses not to participate in the drug price negotiation program must publicly disclose that election (Section 101(d)(1)(2) and Section 101(e)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill lowers essential drug costs and insulin costs which disproportionately helps low-income earners. Would retired people be better off under this? — The bill expands drug price negotiations which provides significant savings for older populations. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill reduces costs for prescription medications which is vital for many people with disabilities. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill expands drug price negotiation and lowers prescription drug expenditures. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill imposes caps on annual out-of-pocket expenditures for prescription drugs. Would union members be better off under this? — The bill lowers costs for participants in group health plans often provided through employers. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — The bill provides out-of-pocket limits that benefit those in the individual insurance market. Would students be better off under this? — The bill provides lower out-of-pocket limits for health insurance coverage. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill provides lower drug costs for participants in various health plans. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill provides out-of-pocket limits that benefit those in the individual insurance market. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all low-to-middle income households. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all low-to-middle income households. Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all households. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all low-to-middle income households. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all households. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all households. Would men be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all households. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all low-to-middle income households. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all households. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all households. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all low-to-middle income households. Would women be better off under this? — The bill reduces medical spending burdens for all households. Would gun owners be better off under this? — The bill reduces costs for healthcare which may indirectly benefit all citizens. Would high-income households be better off under this? — The bill reduces drug costs which may provide marginal savings for high-income earners. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill may increase costs for group health plans and health insurance issuers.
- Healthcare
- Does this lower the price of prescription medicines? — The bill increases the number of drugs subject to negotiation and mandates cost-sharing limits for insulin. Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act? — The bill expands coverage requirements and out-of-pocket limits related to the Affordable Care Act.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By lowering out-of-pocket drug costs and insulin prices, the bill helps reduce financial burdens on low-income families.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill may drive economic growth through lowered costs for many consumers.
- 10/26/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 12/17/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 12/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/1/2025
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- 11/21/2025
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- 11/20/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Steny HoyerDemocrat · Maryland
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
John MannionDemocrat · New York
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Richard NealDemocrat · Massachusetts
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Robert ScottDemocrat · Virginia
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Haley StevensDemocrat · Michigan
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Lauren UnderwoodDemocrat · Illinois
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida