Donald Beyer (D-VA)
Wildlife Road Crossings Program Reauthorization Act of 2025
A Democratic bill with 6 Republican cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Wildlife Road Crossings Program Reauthorization Act of 2025. It changes the existing wildlife crossings pilot program by removing the word pilot and updating the name to a regular program. The bill authorizes $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031 to fund the program. It also sets the Federal cost share for Indian Tribes to 100 percent for their projects. Additionally, the bill provides technical assistance to help Tribes access funding and allows the Secretary to retain a small percentage of funds for grant administration.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +7
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill establishes a 100 percent Federal cost share and technical assistance specifically for Indian Tribes.
- Scored +6
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill reauthorizes and funds the wildlife crossings program to improve habitat connectivity.
- Scored +4
Does this repair or build roads and bridges?
The bill funds wildlife crossing projects which involve infrastructure modifications to roads.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill increases federal spending by authorizing $200,000,000 annually for the wildlife crossings program.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a)(3) authorizes $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031 for the wildlife crossings program, which provides ongoing financial support for these projects.
-
Section 2(b)(1) adds subsection (h) which establishes a 100 percent Federal cost share for Indian Tribes, meaning Tribes do not have to pay matching funds for their grant projects.
-
Section 2(b)(1) adds subsection (i) which provides technical and application assistance to Indian Tribes to help them access funding in an efficient and expeditious manner.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill establishes a 100 percent Federal cost share and technical assistance specifically for Indian Tribes. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Wildlife crossings are infrastructure projects that frequently benefit rural and remote areas.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill reauthorizes and funds the wildlife crossings program to improve habitat connectivity. Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — The bill funds wildlife crossing projects which involve infrastructure modifications to roads.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill increases federal spending by authorizing $200,000,000 annually for the wildlife crossings program.
- 11/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/25/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
- 11/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Vern BuchananRepublican · Florida
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey
Ryan ZinkeRepublican · Montana