Mary Miller (R-IL)
Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 11 Republican cosponsors · See all 11 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the "Promoting Classical Learning Act of 2025." It requires military service academies to allow applicants to use scores from the Classic Learning Test (CLT), SAT, or ACT for admission. Additionally, it requires schools operated by the Department of Defense Education Activity to give the CLT to eleventh grade students. It also requires schools funded or operated by the Bureau of Indian Education to give the CLT to eleventh grade students.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +3
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Provides more options for those applying to military service academies.
- Scored +2
Does this make it easier to use public money at a school other than the local one?
Provides an alternative testing option for service academy admissions.
- Scored +1
Does this give the federal government more power?
Mandates specific testing requirements for federally-run schools.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Would children be better off under this?
Imposes mandatory testing on eleventh grade students in specific school systems.
- Scored -2
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
Requires students in Bureau of Indian Education schools to take an additional mandatory test.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- More options for academy applicants: Applicants to military service academies can choose to submit CLT scores in addition to the SAT or ACT, as stated in Section 2.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Mandatory testing for students: Eleventh grade students in DODEA schools and Bureau of Indian Education schools are required to take the CLT, as stated in Section 3(a) and Section 3(b).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make it easier to use public money at a school other than the local one? — Provides an alternative testing option for service academy admissions.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Mandates specific testing requirements for federally-run schools.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Provides more options for those applying to military service academies. Would students be better off under this? — Positive for academy applicants, but negative for those burdened by mandatory testing. Would children be better off under this? — Imposes mandatory testing on eleventh grade students in specific school systems. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Requires students in Bureau of Indian Education schools to take an additional mandatory test.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/7/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio