A Democratic bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 21 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the School Food Modernization Act. It aims to help local schools, tribal organizations, and educational groups upgrade their kitchens, cafeterias, and food storage facilities. The legislation sets up loan guarantees and equipment grants to help schools buy better food preparation and storage gear. It also creates grant programs for third-party groups to train school cafeteria and food service personnel on meeting nutrition standards. Additionally, the bill requires studies and reports to Congress on how administrative funds are used and how training programs are working. Finally, it cuts some unobligated administrative money from the Department of Education to help pay for these new initiatives.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +6
Would children be better off under this?
The bill invests in better nutrition infrastructure and training to serve healthy meals to students.
- Scored +6
Would students be better off under this?
The bill aims to modernize school food services to provide healthier meals for students.
- Scored +5
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill explicitly identifies tribal organizations as eligible entities for loan guarantees and grants.
The opposite
- Scored -7
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill rescinds $45,000,000 from the Department of Education's administrative expenses to offset costs.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2: This section establishes loan guarantees and equipment grants for local schools, school food authorities, and tribal organizations to construct, remodel, or expand infrastructure like kitchens and cafeterias, and to buy durable cooking and storage equipment over $500. This is positive because it gives schools financial backing to improve the physical spaces where children's meals are prepared and served.
-
Section 3: This section creates a competitive grant program for eligible third-party training institutions—such as nonprofits, higher education institutions, and technical schools—to provide training and technical assistance to school food service personnel. This is a positive step because it helps cafeteria workers learn how to meet or exceed nutrition standards and run school meal programs more efficiently.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 2: This section requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish fees for loan guarantees that cover the cost of the guarantees, and notes that fee shortfalls can be covered by reserved funds. This could potentially create a financial hurdle or burden if the costs and fees associated with securing these loans make it difficult for certain schools to participate.
-
Section 6: This section takes away $45,000,000 from the unobligated administrative expense funds currently available to the Department of Education to offset the costs of the bill. This could be seen as a negative outcome if that money was otherwise intended to support educational administrative functions or programs for students and teachers.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill invests in better nutrition infrastructure and training to serve healthy meals to students. Would students be better off under this? — The bill aims to modernize school food services to provide healthier meals for students. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill explicitly identifies tribal organizations as eligible entities for loan guarantees and grants. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill prioritizes entities with substantial need, which likely includes schools serving low-income populations.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill rescinds $45,000,000 from the Department of Education's administrative expenses to offset costs.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — The bill provides grants and loan guarantees specifically for improving school lunch facilities and personnel training.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill provides loan guarantees through the Under Secretary for Rural Development to improve school food infrastructure.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill provides funding to improve school meal facilities and equipment, which supports nutrition for school-aged children.
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/2/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- 11/18/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
James ComerRepublican · Kentucky
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Marcy KapturDemocrat · Ohio
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California