Mary Miller (R-IL)

Restoring Safeguards for Dangerous Abortion Drugs Act

H.R. 5646 · House bill Health

A Republican bill with 8 Republican cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the "Restoring Safeguards for Dangerous Abortion Drugs Act," directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement specific requirements for mifepristone. It requires the Secretary to withdraw the current risk evaluation and mitigation strategy and replace it with the strategy that was approved in June 2011. The Act also establishes a federal tort that holds certain entities liable for bodily injury or mental health harm resulting from the use of imported or transported covered medication. Additionally, it amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to include a ban on the importation of mifepristone, including via mail.

Yes

No question was scored yes.

The opposite· 3 of 5

  • Scored -8

    Does this make abortion easier to get?

    The bill restricts abortion access by banning the importation of mifepristone via mail and mandating a different risk evaluation and mitigation strategy.

  • Scored -7

    Would women be better off under this?

    The bill restricts access to abortion medication and creates legal liabilities related to its use.

  • Scored -6

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    Restricting the importation of medication via mail can disproportionately affect low-income individuals who rely on more affordable remote access options.