A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 575.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Geothermal Royalty Reform Act. It amends the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970. The text requires royalties on production from leased geothermal resources to be based on production from each electric generating facility. It adds definitions for a geothermal electric generating facility and an in-service date. It changes how the 10-year period for royalty rates is calculated based on the in-service date of the facility.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +6
Would business owners be better off under this?
Energy companies benefit from a royalty structure that tracks specific facility lifecycles rather than the overall lease duration.
- Scored +5
Does this cut taxes for small businesses?
By resetting the 10-year royalty period to the facility's in-service date, the bill provides more favorable long-term royalty terms for new geothermal facility investments.
- Scored +5
Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?
The bill facilitates geothermal energy development by aligning royalty periods with when specific facilities actually begin operating.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2(b) changes the calculation for the 10-year period of royalty rates to begin following the in-service date of the geothermal electric generating facility, which could clearly define when specific royalty rates apply to a facility.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no explicitly mentioned negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — By resetting the 10-year royalty period to the facility's in-service date, the bill provides more favorable long-term royalty terms for new geothermal facility investments. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill creates a more predictable and flexible royalty structure for geothermal energy production, which can encourage industry investment. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The clarification of facility definitions and in-service dates provides greater regulatory certainty for energy producers.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Energy companies benefit from a royalty structure that tracks specific facility lifecycles rather than the overall lease duration. Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill provides more regulatory clarity for resource extraction on or near lands used for various purposes.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — The bill facilitates geothermal energy development by aligning royalty periods with when specific facilities actually begin operating.
- 5/20/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-661.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 575.
- 3/5/2026
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
- 12/16/2025
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
- 9/30/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska