Scott Peters (D-CA)
Fair Housing Improvement Act of 2025
A Democratic bill with 23 Democratic cosponsors · See all 23 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This legislation is known as the Fair Housing Improvement Act of 2025. It amends the Fair Housing Act to make it illegal to discriminate in housing based on a person's source of income, veteran status, or military status. The text defines source of income to include housing vouchers, government housing assistance, social security benefits, child support, court-ordered income, and other lawful funds. It defines military status as being a member of the uniformed services and veteran status as being a former member of the Armed Forces. The bill also updates several sections of existing law to include these new protected classes. Finally, it provides a temporary certification period for agencies handling these matters.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +9
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
Explicitly adds veteran status and military status as protected classes under the Fair Housing Act.
- Scored +8
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Significantly benefits low-income households by preventing landlords from rejecting housing vouchers and assistance.
- Scored +8
Does this make housing cost less?
The bill expands the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination based on source of income, greatly improving housing access for voucher holders and low-income individuals.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Would business owners be better off under this?
Imposes additional regulatory compliance requirements on landlords and property owners.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for Veterans and Military Members: Section 2 prohibits housing discrimination based on veteran status or military status by amending sections 804, 805, 806, 808, and 810 of the Fair Housing Act. This is positive because it helps ensure that current members of the uniformed services and former members of the Armed Forces cannot be turned away from housing simply because of their service.
-
Inclusion of Housing Vouchers and Assistance: Section 2 expands the definition of source of income under section 802 to explicitly include Section 8 housing vouchers, rental assistance, subsidies from nongovernmental organizations, and homeownership subsidies. This is beneficial for individuals and families relying on housing assistance because it stops landlords from rejecting them strictly based on how they pay their rent.
-
Protection for Fixed and Legal Incomes: Section 2 includes monthly benefits under the Social Security Act, supplemental security income, railroad retirement benefits, court-ordered spousal and child support, trust payments, and savings within the definition of source of income. This helps everyday people by protecting individuals who rely on these specific, lawful funds from being discriminated against when looking for a home.
-
Prevention of Intimidation: Section 2 amends section 901 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 to add source of income, veteran status, and military status to protections against intimidation in fair housing cases. This helps keep people safe from threats or force when exercising their housing rights.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Based on the provided text, there are no explicitly stated negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Explicitly adds veteran status and military status as protected classes under the Fair Housing Act. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Significantly benefits low-income households by preventing landlords from rejecting housing vouchers and assistance. Would retired people be better off under this? — Protects retirees relying on Social Security and fixed income benefits from housing discrimination. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Protects seniors relying on Social Security and fixed retirement incomes from housing discrimination. Would children be better off under this? — Protects families with children relying on housing vouchers or child support from housing discrimination. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Protects individuals relying on disability benefits and supplemental security income from housing discrimination. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Provides indirect benefits to minority communities who disproportionately utilize housing assistance programs. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Provides indirect benefits to minority communities who disproportionately utilize housing assistance programs. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Improves housing access in urban areas where housing vouchers are commonly used. Would women be better off under this? — Protects individuals receiving court-ordered spousal and child support, who are frequently women. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides protections for middle-class individuals relying on lawful supplemental funds or savings when renting. Would business owners be better off under this? — Imposes additional regulatory compliance requirements on landlords and property owners.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — The bill expands the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination based on source of income, greatly improving housing access for voucher holders and low-income individuals. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — Prohibiting source of income discrimination helps vulnerable individuals secure housing and reduces barriers that contribute to homelessness. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By protecting housing access for individuals relying on government assistance and fixed incomes, the bill supports poverty reduction efforts.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The legislation explicitly protects veterans and active-duty military members from housing discrimination.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The legislation expands federal anti-discrimination oversight under the Fair Housing Act.
- 10/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan