A Democratic bill with 12 Democratic cosponsors · See all 12 cosponsors
Last activity — ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORHSIP - Mr. Magaziner asked unanimous consent that he may be hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 537, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "INCREASE Housing Affordability Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to incentivize the conversion of commercial buildings into residential units. It establishes a commercial-to-residential tax credit based on a percentage of qualified conversion expenditures. The legislation also provides for bonus credits for affordable housing and prevailing wage requirements. Additionally, the bill directs the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to establish an advisory board. This board is tasked with providing technical assistance and support to State and local housing agencies to advance housing conversion opportunities.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +7
Does this make housing cost less?
The bill provides significant bonus tax credits for converting buildings into rent-restricted housing for low-income individuals.
- Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill incentivizes the creation of rent-restricted housing specifically for those with incomes below area median levels.
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill provides tax credits to property owners looking to convert commercial assets into residential ones.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Tax Credits for Conversions: Taxpayers can receive a credit equal to 15 percent of qualified conversion expenditures, with limits of $200,000 per new residential housing unit and $10,000,000 per building (Section 2(b)).
-
Increased Affordable Housing Supply: A bonus credit is available for converted buildings that are primarily used for rental and meet specific rent and income requirements (Section 2(b)(d)(1)).
-
Support for Lower Income Individuals: The bill provides higher bonus credit percentages for buildings where at least 25 percent of units are rent-restricted and occupied by individuals earning 100 percent or less of the area median income, 80 percent or less, or 60 percent or less (Section 2(b)(d)(1)(A)).
-
Wage Protections: A bonus credit of 15 percent is available if the taxpayer certifies that all laborers or mechanics were paid wages at rates not less than the prevailing rates for similar work in the locality (Section 2(b)(d)(2)).
-
Technical and Logistical Support for Localities: An advisory board will provide State and local housing agencies with help in identifying feasible candidates, conducting feasibility analyses, and expediting regulatory and permitting processes (Section 3(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Exclusions on Certain Costs: The tax credit does not cover the cost of acquiring a building or expenditures related to the enlargement of an existing building (Section 2(b)(e)(2)(B)).
-
Restrictions on Tax-Exempt Property: Expenditures for the conversion of a building that is part of tax-exempt use property are excluded from the credit, with specific exceptions for eligible educational institutions (Section 2(b)(e)(2)(B)(iv)).
-
Lease Term Limitations: Expenditures made by a lessee are not included if the remaining term of the lease is less than the recovery period determined under section 168(c) (Section 2(b)(e)(2)(B)(v)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill incentivizes the creation of rent-restricted housing specifically for those with incomes below area median levels. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides tax credits to property owners looking to convert commercial assets into residential ones. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill targets the conversion of underutilized commercial buildings which are often located in urban areas. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Increasing the housing supply through commercial conversions may help ease housing costs for middle-income families.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — The bill provides significant bonus tax credits for converting buildings into rent-restricted housing for low-income individuals. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By increasing the supply of rent-restricted housing, the bill aims to support individuals earning low percentages of the area median income.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The bill offers a bonus credit for taxpayers who pay laborers and mechanics wages at the prevailing local rates. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill incentivizes commercial-to-residential conversions to increase housing supply and stimulate construction. Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — The bill provides a 15 percent tax credit for the conversion of commercial buildings into residential units.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — The bill encourages the reuse of existing urban commercial infrastructure for residential use.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The establishment of an advisory board to assist local agencies provides a more structured process for housing conversions.
- 11/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORHSIP - Mr. Magaziner asked unanimous consent that he may be hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 537, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/16/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Introduced in House
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia