A Republican bill with 7 Republican cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Forum Accountability and Integrity in Roadway Trucking Act or the FAIR Trucking Act. It changes title 28 of the United States Code to give Federal district courts jurisdiction over certain highway accident actions. The bill applies to civil actions against interstate motor carriers. It targets cases involving bodily harm or loss of life with commercial motor vehicles on public roads. The matter in controversy must exceed five million dollars and involve parties from different states or foreign states.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill expands the original jurisdiction of federal district courts over certain civil actions.
- Scored +3
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The bill establishes a specific federal avenue for litigating high-value personal injury claims involving interstate motor carriers.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The $5,000,000 threshold may exclude many injury claims brought by low-income individuals.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2 provides Federal district court jurisdiction for civil actions involving bodily harm or loss of life with commercial motor vehicles when plaintiffs and defendants are from different states, which ensures out-of-state parties have access to federal courts for major highway accident claims exceeding five million dollars.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 2 sets a high financial threshold by requiring the matter in controversy to exceed five million dollars, which could leave everyday people who suffer damages under that amount without access to Federal district court jurisdiction under this specific provision.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands the original jurisdiction of federal district courts over certain civil actions. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The bill establishes a specific federal avenue for litigating high-value personal injury claims involving interstate motor carriers.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The $5,000,000 threshold may exclude many injury claims brought by low-income individuals.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin