A Democratic bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to establish a teacher leader development program through competitive grants. The program focuses on providing professional development and training to classroom teachers who take on leadership roles to improve student academic achievement and school needs. Participating teachers continue to work as classroom instructors while carrying out formalized leadership duties like curriculum development, peer coaching, and family engagement. The legislation outlines specific criteria for selecting experienced and certified teachers to participate in the program for a duration of two to three years. Additionally, the bill authorizes the appropriation of funds for fiscal year 2025 and the five succeeding fiscal years to support these programs.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +5
Does this put more money into public schools?
The bill authorizes new grant funding and appropriations to support teacher leader development programs in schools.
- Scored +4
Would children be better off under this?
Enhanced teacher leadership and professional development are designed to improve student academic achievement.
- Scored +4
Would students be better off under this?
The core objective of the bill is to increase student academic achievement through better supported teachers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Professional Growth and Credentials for Teachers: Section 2(a)(2)(A) provides teachers in the program with one year of professional development, training, and support that may result in the awarding of a credential in teacher leadership. This gives educators structured support and formal recognition for advancing their skills.
- Financial Support through Stipends: Section 2(a)(4)(D) allows grant funds to pay for a portion of a stipend for teacher leaders when matched by non-Federal public or private funds. This helps financially support teachers who take on extra leadership duties.
- Targeted School and Student Improvements: Section 2(a)(1) mandates that teacher leaders carry out formalized leadership responsibilities to increase academic achievement and address demonstrated school needs, such as curriculum development, peer observations, and family engagement. This benefits the entire school community by focusing on collaborative learning and student success.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Mandatory Repayments for Incomplete Terms: Section 2(a)(4)(E) allows the program to require teacher leaders to pay back the cost of attaining their teacher leadership credential if they do not complete their term of service in the program. This could place a financial burden on teachers who are unable to finish their service due to unforeseen circumstances.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Enhanced teacher leadership and professional development are designed to improve student academic achievement. Would students be better off under this? — The core objective of the bill is to increase student academic achievement through better supported teachers. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Targeting high-need schools helps direct resources to lower-income communities and students. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Teachers and public school families benefit from professional growth opportunities and improved school environments. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults in teacher preparation or early career stages benefit from structured mentorship and leadership pathways. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Focusing on high-need schools and cultural competencies can positively impact minority student populations. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Focusing on high-need schools and cultural competencies can positively impact minority student populations. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Focusing on high-need schools can support historically underserved student demographics. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Rural school districts facing recruitment and retention challenges can utilize these grants for teacher leadership. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban school districts often qualify as high-need local educational agencies under such grant programs. Would women be better off under this? — The teaching profession comprises a high percentage of women who will benefit from professional development and stipends.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — The bill authorizes new grant funding and appropriations to support teacher leader development programs in schools.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill promotes teacher leadership roles and professional development frameworks within schools. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Investing in educator effectiveness can yield long-term improvements in human capital and workforce readiness.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The legislation establishes federally funded competitive grants administered through the Higher Education Act.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The program emphasizes cultural competencies and meeting demonstrated needs in high-need schools.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Lauren UnderwoodDemocrat · Illinois