Nancy Mace (R-SC)
Restoring Merit in the Military Act
A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Restoring Merit in the Military Act aims to ensure equal opportunity and racial neutrality across the Department of Defense. It mandates that all military personnel actions be based exclusively on merit, fitness, capability, and performance. Under this bill, considering an individual's race, ethnicity, or national origin in personnel actions is prohibited. However, a limited exception exists for specific, unconventional missions in foreign countries to optimize mission success. These specific taskings require approval from the relevant combatant commander. Additionally, the Secretary of Defense must report these exception-based taskings to the House and Senate Committees on Armed Services.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +3
Would white Americans be better off under this?
The bill establishes a merit-only system that removes race-based considerations from promotions and assignments.
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires the Secretary of Defense to report specific mission taskings involving demographic factors to Congressional committees.
- Scored +2
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The emphasis on merit and performance for assignments and schooling may benefit those focused on career progression through skill.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -5
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill prohibits the consideration of race, ethnicity, or national origin in military personnel actions, which may limit diversity initiatives aimed at addressing racial gaps.
- Scored -4
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The prohibition on considering race or ethnicity in personnel actions could negatively impact programs intended to foster racial diversity in the military.
- Scored -4
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
The bill's restriction on considering national origin or ethnicity may limit the ability to implement targeted diversity and inclusion efforts.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Merit-Based Advancement: Section 2(a) requires that all actions—including accessions, promotions, assignments, and schooling—be based exclusively on merit, fitness, capability, and performance. This ensures that individuals are judged on their actual abilities and performance.
-
Racial Neutrality: Section 2(b) prohibits the consideration of race, ethnicity, or national origin in any military personnel action. This aims to ensure that these factors do not influence a person's career within the Department of Defense.
-
Mission Optimization: Section 2(c)(1) allows for a narrow exception where race, ethnicity, or national origin can be considered for specific, unconventional missions in foreign countries. This is intended to optimize mission success based on the local ground operating environment.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Restriction of Personnel Decisions: Section 2(b) prohibits the use of race, ethnicity, or national origin in any military personnel action. This removes these factors from the decision-making process throughout the entire Department of Defense.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would white Americans be better off under this? — The bill establishes a merit-only system that removes race-based considerations from promotions and assignments. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The emphasis on merit and performance for assignments and schooling may benefit those focused on career progression through skill. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The prohibition on considering race or ethnicity in personnel actions could negatively impact programs intended to foster racial diversity in the military. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The prohibition of race-based considerations in personnel actions may affect demographic-specific advancement opportunities. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill's restriction on considering national origin or ethnicity may limit the ability to implement targeted diversity and inclusion efforts.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill prohibits the consideration of race, ethnicity, or national origin in military personnel actions, which may limit diversity initiatives aimed at addressing racial gaps.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Secretary of Defense to report specific mission taskings involving demographic factors to Congressional committees.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The mandate for merit-based accessions and promotions may ensure personnel are selected based on capability and performance.
- 8/22/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia