A Democratic bill with 56 Democratic cosponsors · See all 56 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Safeguarding the Use of the National Guard Act" or the "SUN Act," focuses on providing congressional oversight regarding the domestic use of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. It requires the President to submit a detailed report to Congress within 15 days of any such deployment or use within the United States. The report must include the legal basis, goals, costs, and descriptions of interactions with civilians. Additionally, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau must provide a briefing on the effectiveness of the deployment. This oversight requirement does not apply to deployments made in response to natural disasters or weather-related events under the Robert T. for Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates detailed reporting to Congress on the legal basis, goals, and civilian interactions resulting from domestic military deployments.
- Scored +4
Would people in cities be better off under this?
The bill mandates reporting on interactions between the military and civilians during domestic deployments which often occur in urban settings.
- Scored +4
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The bill mandates reporting on interactions between the military and civilians during domestic deployments which often occur in rural areas.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency of Presidential Actions: The President must submit a report to Congress including the precise legal basis, goals, and evidence for any deployment of reserve components within the United States (Section 2(a)(1)(A)).
-
Public Accountability Regarding Civil Interactions: The bill requires descriptions of the effects of a deployment, specifically including reports of interactions between members of the Armed Forces and civilians involved in violence or threats of violence (Section 2(a)(1)(B)).
-
Involvement of Local Authorities: The bill mandates the inclusion of reports from local and State law enforcement agencies regarding interactions and their assessment of whether the deployment was appropriate (Section 2(a)(1)(C)).
-
Financial Accountability: The President must identify the total cost to the Federal Government, including indirect costs borne by the Department of Defense and civilians called up to serve in the National Guard (Section 2(a)(1)(D)).
-
Disaster Preparedness Assurance: The President must certify that a deployment will not interfere with the military's ability to respond to disasters covered by a presidential declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Section 2(a)(1)(E)).
-
Assessment of Deployment Success: The Chief of the National Guard Bureau is required to brief Congress on whether the deployment actually reduced violence and met the President's stated goals (Section 2(a)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly identified in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill mandates reporting on interactions between the military and civilians during domestic deployments which often occur in rural areas. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill mandates reporting on interactions between the military and civilians during domestic deployments which often occur in urban settings. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Increased oversight of domestic military deployment may provide greater protection against unregulated interactions with civilian populations. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Increased oversight of domestic military deployment may provide greater protection against unregulated interactions with civilian populations. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Increased oversight of domestic military deployment may provide greater protection against unregulated interactions with civilian populations. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Increased oversight of domestic military deployment may provide greater protection against unregulated interactions with civilian populations. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Increased oversight of domestic military deployment may provide greater protection against unregulated interactions with civilian populations. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill tracks costs associated with civilians called up to serve in the National Guard.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates detailed reporting to Congress on the legal basis, goals, and civilian interactions resulting from domestic military deployments. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Increased transparency regarding military-civilian interactions provides more public accountability for government actions.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill increases oversight of military interactions with civilians and requires local law enforcement assessments of deployment propriety.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — The bill requires the President to identify the total cost of deployments, including indirect costs, to provide financial transparency.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill requires reporting on indirect costs borne by civilians called up to serve, which includes National Guard members.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/22/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 8/19/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 44 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Cleo FieldsDemocrat · Louisiana
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Kelly MorrisonDemocrat · Minnesota
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Luz RivasDemocrat · California
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California