A Democratic bill with 54 Democratic cosponsors · See all 54 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the "Gun Violence Prevention Research Act of 2025". It authorizes $50,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2031. These funds are for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct or support research on gun violence prevention or firearms safety. This funding is provided in addition to any other authorized amounts for these purposes.
Yes· 3 of 26
- Scored +8
Does this put more money into scientific research?
Directly authorizes funding for scientific research via the CDC.
- Scored +8
Does this put more money into medical research?
Provides $50 million annually specifically for public health research on gun violence.
- Scored +5
Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns?
Research funding often supports the evidence base for implementing gun violence prevention measures.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
Increases federal spending by authorizing new appropriations for the CDC.
- Scored -2
Does this protect the right to own guns?
Funding for prevention research is often viewed by opponents as a precursor to stricter firearm regulations.
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
Authorizes additional government spending of $50 million annually.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Research on Safety and Prevention: The bill provides funding for the CDC to conduct or support research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention (SEC. 2). This could lead to better information on how to prevent gun violence and improve firearm safety.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for people are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Research on prevention can help address systemic violence in marginalized communities. Would children be better off under this? — Research on gun violence prevention aims to reduce harm to all citizens, including children. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Research on prevention can help address systemic violence in marginalized communities. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Contributes to overall public safety research. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Contributes to overall public safety research. Would students be better off under this? — Research on school safety and violence prevention benefits students. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban areas are often more affected by gun violence, making prevention research highly valuable. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Aims to improve safety and reduce violence affecting young adults. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Gun violence disproportionately affects low-income communities; research may lead to better prevention. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Research on prevention can help address violence in indigenous communities. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Research may lead to better suicide prevention and firearms safety for veterans. Would women be better off under this? — Research may include focuses on domestic violence prevention. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would gun owners be better off under this? — Explicitly includes funding for research on 'firearms safety', which can benefit owners. Would high-income households be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would immigrants be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would men be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would retired people be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety. Would white Americans be better off under this? — General improvement in public health and safety.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Directly authorizes funding for scientific research via the CDC.
- Healthcare
- Does this put more money into medical research? — Provides $50 million annually specifically for public health research on gun violence.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — Increases federal spending by authorizing new appropriations for the CDC. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Increases expenditures without specifying an offsetting revenue source. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Authorizes additional government spending of $50 million annually.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns? — Research funding often supports the evidence base for implementing gun violence prevention measures. Does this protect the right to own guns? — Funding for prevention research is often viewed by opponents as a precursor to stricter firearm regulations.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Expands the federal government's role and funding in researching public safety.
- 8/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/18/2026
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- 6/8/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/18/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/29/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 8/15/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/29/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
James HimesDemocrat · Connecticut
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Robert MenendezDemocrat · New Jersey
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Richard NealDemocrat · Massachusetts
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Mikie SherrillDemocrat · New Jersey
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia