A Democratic bill with 32 Democratic cosponsors · See all 32 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Reproductive Health Travel Fund Act of 2025 authorizes grants to help individuals access abortion services. The Secretary of the Treasury will award these funds to eligible entities to cover travel-related costs and logistical support. These funds can be used for things like transportation, lodging, meals, and childcare. The bill aims to help people who face barriers due to abortion bans or restrictions in their own states. Priority will be given to organizations serving people in restricted jurisdictions or those who facilitate travel across state lines. The act also authorizes up to $350,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2030.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +7
Would women be better off under this?
The bill specifically targets increasing access to reproductive healthcare services.
- Scored +7
Does this make abortion easier to get?
The bill provides significant financial and logistical support to help individuals access abortion services.
- Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill helps offset costs that disproportionately affect low-income individuals seeking healthcare.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill explicitly supersedes state laws that would prohibit the use of these funds.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Financial Assistance for Travel and Logistics: The bill allows grants to be used for round trip travel, lodging, meals, childcare, and lost wages to help people access abortion services (Section 3(c)(1)).
-
Support for Educational and Practical Needs: Funds can be used for translation services, doula care, and patient education or information services (Section 3(c)(1)).
-
Organizational Strengthening: Eligible entities can use up to 15 percent of their grant money for community outreach, website maintenance, and increasing staff capacity (Section 3(c)(2)).
-
Legal Protection for Program Participants: The law states that federal officials cannot cooperate with state, tribal, territorial, or local antiabortion proceedings or investigations related to these programs (Section 3(g)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Restricted Use of Funds: The grant money cannot be used to pay for the actual cost of an abortion procedure (Section 3(c)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill specifically targets increasing access to reproductive healthcare services. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill helps offset costs that disproportionately affect low-income individuals seeking healthcare. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill addresses findings that Black women face disproportionate impacts from abortion restrictions. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill helps people in rural areas overcome travel barriers to access care.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The bill provides resources to assist women and people of reproductive age in accessing reproductive healthcare. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill targets support to populations disproportionately impacted by abortion restrictions, including people of color. Does this make child care cost less? — The bill allows grant funds to be used to cover childcare expenses for those seeking abortion services.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The bill provides significant financial and logistical support to help individuals access abortion services. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — By covering travel and ancillary costs, the bill helps remove barriers to healthcare access for abortion seekers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill uses federal authority to preempt state laws regarding the use of these specific funds. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill explicitly supersedes state laws that would prohibit the use of these funds.
- 11/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida