A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 15 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Poarch Band of Creek Indians Parity Act," aims to reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization Act to the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. It specifies that the tribe shall be considered "now under Federal jurisdiction" as of June 18, 1934. Additionally, the Act addresses lands taken into trust for the benefit of the tribe. It reaffirms these lands as trust land. Finally, it ratifies and confirms the actions of the Secretary of the Interior regarding those lands.
Yes
- Scored +9
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill specifically benefits the Poarch Band of Creek Indians by reaffirming their trust land status.
- Scored +7
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill supports tribal sovereignty and land rights for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.
- Scored +5
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The bill reaffirms trust land status for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Status Reaffirmation: By considering the Poarch Band of Creek Indians as "now under Federal jurisdiction" as of June 18, 1934, the bill applies the Indian Reorganization Act to the tribe (Section 2(a)).
-
Land Security: The bill reaffirms all lands taken into trust by the United States for the benefit of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians as trust land (Section 2(b)).
-
Official Confirmation: The Act ratifies and confirms the actions taken by the Secretary of the Interior in taking lands into trust under the Indian Reorganization Act (Section 2(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill specifically benefits the Poarch Band of Creek Indians by reaffirming their trust land status.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill supports tribal sovereignty and land rights for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The bill reaffirms trust land status for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Tom ColeRepublican · Oklahoma
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
David JoyceRepublican · Ohio
Trent KellyRepublican · Mississippi
Doug LaMalfaRepublican · California
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Michael SimpsonRepublican · Idaho
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Dale StrongRepublican · Alabama