A Republican bill with 26 Democratic cosponsors · See all 31 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2025 aims to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. It would require group health plans to ensure cost-sharing for oral anticancer drugs is no less favorable than the cost-sharing for medications administered by a health care provider. This applies to FDA-approved medications used to kill, slow, or prevent the growth of cancerous cells that are deemed medically necessary or clinically appropriate by a physician. The bill also prevents plans from changing benefits in ways that increase out-of-pocket costs for these drugs. These changes would take effect for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. Additionally, the Act mandates a GAO study to assess the impact of these changes on out-of-pocket costs.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +6
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
By lowering financial barriers to oral cancer medications, the bill improves access to essential treatment.
- Scored +6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill protects consumers from unfair out-of-pocket cost increases for vital cancer medications.
- Scored +5
Does this lower the price of prescription medicines?
The bill reduces out-of-pocket costs for specific oral anticancer drugs through parity requirements.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Would business owners be better off under this?
Employers may face slightly higher costs to maintain specific benefit structures.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reduced out-of-pocket costs for oral medications: Group health plans would be required to provide cost-sharing for prescribed, patient-administered anticancer medications that is no less favorable than the cost-sharing for medications administered intravenously or injected by a health care provider (Section 2(a)).
-
Protection against cost increases: The bill prevents health plans from changing benefits or replacing existing benefits in ways designed to increase out-of-pocket costs or reclassify benefits to increase costs for anticancer medications (Section 2(c)).
-
Protection against restrictive limitations: Plans are prohibited from applying more restrictive limitations on prescribed oral anticancer medications than on those that are administered intravenously or injected (Section 2(c)).
-
Data-driven insights for future access: The GAO is required to conduct a study to assess the impact of this law on out-of-pocket costs and provide recommendations to Congress on how to reduce financial barriers to accessing these medications (Section 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Existing utilization controls remain: The bill does not prevent group health plans from requiring prior authorization or imposing other appropriate utilization controls when approving coverage for chemotherapy (Section 2(d)).
-
No requirement for specific medication types: The law does not require a group health plan to use orally administered anticancer medications as a replacement for other anticancer medications (Section 2(d)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — By lowering financial barriers to oral cancer medications, the bill improves access to essential treatment. Does this lower the price of prescription medicines? — The bill reduces out-of-pocket costs for specific oral anticancer drugs through parity requirements.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The required GAO study increases transparency regarding cancer drug costs and access. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal oversight of group health plan benefit structures.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Reducing out-of-pocket drug costs provides significant relief to low-income families facing cancer. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Middle-class employees with group health plans will see more predictable costs for anticancer drugs. Would business owners be better off under this? — Employers may face slightly higher costs to maintain specific benefit structures.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill protects consumers from unfair out-of-pocket cost increases for vital cancer medications.
- 10/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/7/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Robert BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Herbert ConawayDemocrat · New Jersey
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina