Glenn Grothman (R-WI)

Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2025

H.R. 4101 · House bill Health

A Republican bill with 26 Democratic cosponsors · See all 31 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2025 aims to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. It would require group health plans to ensure cost-sharing for oral anticancer drugs is no less favorable than the cost-sharing for medications administered by a health care provider. This applies to FDA-approved medications used to kill, slow, or prevent the growth of cancerous cells that are deemed medically necessary or clinically appropriate by a physician. The bill also prevents plans from changing benefits in ways that increase out-of-pocket costs for these drugs. These changes would take effect for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. Additionally, the Act mandates a GAO study to assess the impact of these changes on out-of-pocket costs.

Yes· 3 of 7

  • Scored +6

    Does this make health care easier to get in general?

    By lowering financial barriers to oral cancer medications, the bill improves access to essential treatment.

  • Scored +6

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    The bill protects consumers from unfair out-of-pocket cost increases for vital cancer medications.

  • Scored +5

    Does this lower the price of prescription medicines?

    The bill reduces out-of-pocket costs for specific oral anticancer drugs through parity requirements.

The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Employers may face slightly higher costs to maintain specific benefit structures.