Morgan Luttrell (R-TX)
Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act
A Republican bill with 8 Democratic cosponsors · See all 18 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act," aims to regulate all eligible federally recognized Tribes under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Currently, the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe are the only two Tribes with overlapping regulatory language for their gaming activities. This legislation seeks to eliminate that redundancy. It does so by amending the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act. The goal is to ensure these specific Tribes are regulated in the same manner as all other Indian Tribes in the United States.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +4
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill harmonizes the regulatory status of specific tribes with the broader Indian Gaming Regulatory Act used by other tribes.
- Scored +3
Is this likely to grow the economy?
Standardizing regulatory structures can promote tribal economic development and self-sufficiency.
- Scored +3
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill subjects specific tribal gaming activities more fully to the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Elimination of Redundant Regulation: This Act will eliminate redundant regulatory language regarding gaming activities (Section 2, Finding 6).
-
Regulatory Uniformity: The bill ensures that the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe are regulated in the same form and manner as all other gaming by Indian Tribes in the United States (Section 2, Finding 6).
-
Full Applicability of Existing Acts: The Act ensures the full applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to gaming activities on the lands of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe (Section 3, Amendment 1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Removal of Specific Regulatory Protections: The bill strikes section 107 and section 207 of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (Section 3, Amendment 2 and 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — Standardizing regulatory structures can promote tribal economic development and self-sufficiency. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Bringing tribal gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act can improve oversight and consumer protection.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill subjects specific tribal gaming activities more fully to the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Clarifying regulatory structures improves the transparency of how tribal gaming is governed.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill harmonizes the regulatory status of specific tribes with the broader Indian Gaming Regulatory Act used by other tribes.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Standardizing the regulatory status of these specific tribes aligns them with other federally recognized tribes.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/23/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico