Kim Schrier (D-WA)

Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act

H.R. 3657 · House bill Energy

A Democratic bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors

Last activity — Became Public Law No: 119-112.

Became law

Passed both chambers and was signed by the President, or became law without a signature.

Nothing more in Congress: it is law. When it takes effect depends on the dates written into it — some parts start at once, others a year or more later.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House voice vote
  3. Passed Senate unanimous consent
  4. To President
  5. Became Law

No one's position on it was recorded: the House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together), and the Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote).

What this bill would do

This bill is known as the Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act. It amends the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to submit a yearly report to Congress. This report must cover the status of ongoing hydropower relicensing and original licensing applications. The first report is due no later than 180 days after the enactment of the section. The report must include specific details like docket numbers, filing dates, and anticipated issuance dates. Furthermore, the information in the report must be separated by the type of license.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Scored +5

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The act mandates annual public reports to Congress to increase transparency in the hydropower licensing process.

  • Scored +3

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    The bill increases oversight and transparency in the management of hydropower-related land and water assets.

  • Scored +2

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill increases the reporting requirements and procedural clarity of a federal agency (FERC).

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.