Jay Obernolte (R-CA)

AI Whistleblower Protection Act

H.R. 3460 · House bill Labor and Employment

A Republican bill with 8 Democratic cosponsors · See all 10 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The AI Whistleblower Protection Act aims to prohibit employment discrimination against individuals who report AI security vulnerabilities or violations. It defines AI security vulnerabilities as failures that could allow technology to be stolen and AI violations as federal law violations or failures to respond to dangers to public safety, health, or national security. The bill protects employees and independent contractors from retaliation such as firing, demotion, or harassment for sharing information with officials, law enforcement, or supervisors. It establishes enforcement procedures through the Secretary of Labor or via district court actions. If a worker prevails, they may receive reinstatement, back pay, and compensatory damages.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Scored +6

    Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?

    By protecting whistleblowers reporting AI vulnerabilities, the bill helps identify and mitigate security threats.

  • Scored +5

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    By encouraging reports of AI violations, the bill promotes transparency in the deployment of new technologies.

  • Scored +5

    Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?

    The bill enhances protections for workers, including independent contractors, against employer retaliation.

The opposite

  • Scored -3

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The bill creates potential legal liabilities and administrative burdens for employers.