Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY)
Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2025'', aims to amend the Public Health Service Act. It specifically seeks to reauthorize lifespan respite care programs. The legislation includes a change to the definition of a Family Caregiver by replacing the term unpaid adult'' with ``unpaid individual''. Additionally, it updates the funding years for these programs. The proposed changes extend the funding period to cover fiscal years 2025 through 2029.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +5
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Respite care is highly beneficial for seniors receiving care at home.
- Scored +5
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
Respite care provides essential support for individuals with disabilities and their caregivers.
- Scored +5
Would retired people be better off under this?
Ensures continued support for retirees and those caring for elderly family members.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Updated Definition of Family Caregiver: Under Section 2, subsection (a), the bill changes the definition of a family caregiver from an
unpaid adult'' to anunpaid individual''. This provides a broader definition for those providing care. -
Extended Program Funding: Section 2, subsection (b) updates the funding period from
fiscal years 2020 through fiscal year 2024'' tofiscal years 2025 through 2029''. This ensures that lifespan respite care programs have authorized funding for this new period.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Respite care provides essential support for individuals with disabilities and their caregivers. Would retired people be better off under this? — Ensures continued support for retirees and those caring for elderly family members. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Respite care is highly beneficial for seniors receiving care at home. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Continued funding for respite care helps low-income families manage caregiving needs. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides support for middle-class families managing caregiving responsibilities. Would women be better off under this? — Women disproportionately serve as caregivers and benefit from expanded respite support.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The reauthorization ensures continued funding for respite care programs which improves access to caregiving support.
- 2/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/1/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii