William Keating (D-MA)
The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025
A Democratic bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 3.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, known as "The U.S.-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Act of 2025," directs the Secretary of State to create a strategy to strengthen nuclear energy cooperation between the United States and Europe. The goal is to combat Russian and Chinese malign influence within the European nuclear energy sector. The strategy must include assessments of various reactor types, fuel cycles, and the current role of the United States in the market. It also requires an overview of how the U.S. can help reduce Russia's market share in nuclear infrastructure. Additionally, the bill seeks to promote the use of American and allied technologies to ensure energy security.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +5
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?
The bill strengthens ties with European allies through shared energy security goals.
- Scored +4
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?
It mandates a formal strategy for diplomatic engagement in the European nuclear sector.
- Scored +4
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
Promoting nuclear energy and Small Modular Reactors supports clean energy transitions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Energy Security: The bill aims to reduce Russia's influence over the European energy supply and help achieve long-term energy security (Section 3; Section 4(b)(3)).
-
Support for Clean Energy Needs: The strategy encourages the use of Small Modular Reactor Technology to help partner countries meet clean energy needs through scalable and secure programs (Section 3).
-
Economic Opportunities for Allies: The bill encourages prioritizing products and services from the United States and its allies, such as Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Korea (Section 3).
-
Countering Disinformation: Funding is authorized to support efforts in countering Russian disinformation campaigns (Section 5).
-
Capacity Building: The strategy includes focusing on capacity building and early-stage project support to expand the nuclear industry in Europe (Section 3; Section 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Commercial Competition Issues: The strategy must address potential commercial competitiveness issues that may arise between United States companies and companies from Europe, Canada, Japan, and the Republic of Korea (Section 4(b)(9)).
-
Deployment Challenges: The bill notes that various reactor types may face challenges regarding costs, market barriers for first-of-a-kind designs, and supply chain constraints (Section 4(b)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The bill strengthens ties with European allies through shared energy security goals. Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — It mandates a formal strategy for diplomatic engagement in the European nuclear sector. Does this make trade with other countries easier? — The bill promotes the export of U.S. and allied nuclear technologies to Europe.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Promoting nuclear energy and Small Modular Reactors supports clean energy transitions. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — The bill supports the deployment of nuclear energy as a carbon-free energy source. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The emphasis on safety and nonproliferation standards protects the environment. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — Increasing nuclear capacity can reduce reliance on fossil fuel-based energy systems.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill promotes American nuclear industry participation in European markets which may lead to job growth. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Expanding the export market for U.S. nuclear technologies supports domestic economic growth.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill favors U.S. and allied nuclear energy companies.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The bill supports the development and deployment of advanced nuclear technologies.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires submission of a formal strategy to Congressional committees. Does this give the federal government more power? — It expands the role of the Secretary of State in international energy strategy.
- 3/26/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 3.
- 3/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/31/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California