David Rouzer (R-NC)

Maritime Supply Chain Security Act

H.R. 2390 · House bill Transportation and Public Works

A Republican bill with no cosponsors

Last activity — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

In the other chamber's committee

Passed one chamber and has been handed to a committee in the other.

The committee decides whether it goes any further, and most bills that reach a committee never leave it. A committee that simply does nothing kills a bill without anyone ever voting against it, so no news from here is usually the news.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House voice vote
  3. In Senate committee

The House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together): no member's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the ``Maritime Supply Chain Security Act,'' aims to amend title 46 of the United States Code. It focuses on clarifying the use of port infrastructure development program funds. Specifically, it allows these funds to be used for projects to upgrade or replace port cranes or their components. This includes both hardware and software. The amendment specifically targets equipment that was installed, provided, maintained, controlled, or sponsored by the People's Republic of China or its government entities.

Yes· 3 of 7

  • Scored +5

    Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?

    The bill helps mitigate national security risks by replacing software and hardware controlled by the Chinese government.

  • Scored +2

    Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?

    Reducing reliance on Chinese-controlled infrastructure may strengthen the security of maritime trade routes shared with allies.

  • Scored +2

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    More secure and modernized port infrastructure can facilitate smoother business operations and trade.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.