A Republican bill with 14 Democratic cosponsors · See all 45 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Motorsports Fairness and Permanency Act of 2025. It was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 18, 2025. The bill aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Specifically, it makes the 7-year recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes permanent.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
Directly benefits owners of motorsports entertainment complexes via permanent accelerated depreciation.
- Scored +3
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
Provides a permanent tax advantage for significant capital investments in specific entertainment real estate.
- Scored +3
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?
Provides a permanent tax advantage for high-value investments in motorsports complexes.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this raise the taxes companies pay?
Making the 7-year recovery period permanent reduces the taxable income of corporations owning these complexes via accelerated depreciation.
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
Accelerated depreciation reduces government tax revenue, potentially increasing the deficit.
- Scored -1
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
Makes a tax expenditure permanent, reducing long-term federal revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Permanency for Motorsports Complexes: Section 2 of the bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by striking subparagraph (D) of section 168(i)(15) to make the 7-year recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes permanent. This could be seen as positive because it provides lasting tax certainty for these specific entertainment complexes.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Found: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Directly benefits owners of motorsports entertainment complexes via permanent accelerated depreciation. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Billionaires owning sports and entertainment complexes benefit from the permanent recovery period. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Provides a permanent tax advantage for significant capital investments in specific entertainment real estate. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Provides a permanent tax advantage for high-value investments in motorsports complexes. Would high-income households be better off under this? — High-income individuals who own or invest in motorsports complexes benefit from the tax incentive. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Likely to support local economies in rural areas where motorsports complexes are typically located.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Benefits owners of specialized entertainment venues through permanent tax advantages. Is this likely to create jobs? — Permanent tax incentives for entertainment complexes may encourage investment and construction of new facilities, creating jobs. Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — Provides tax relief for owners of motorsports complexes through a permanent accelerated depreciation schedule. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Encourages capital investment in the motorsports and entertainment sector. Does this raise the taxes companies pay? — Making the 7-year recovery period permanent reduces the taxable income of corporations owning these complexes via accelerated depreciation. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Makes a tax expenditure permanent, reducing long-term federal revenue. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Accelerated depreciation reduces government tax revenue, potentially increasing the deficit.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Motorsports complexes are often located in rural areas, and permanent tax incentives may spur regional investment.
- 10/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Vern BuchananRepublican · Florida
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
Carlos GimenezRepublican · Florida
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Brad KnottRepublican · North Carolina
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Mike RogersRepublican · Alabama
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
David SchweikertRepublican · Arizona
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Norma TorresDemocrat · California
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
Tim WalbergRepublican · Michigan
Rudy YakymRepublican · Indiana