Ryan Mackenzie (R-PA)

DHS Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program and Law Enforcement Support Act

H.R. 2212 · House bill Armed Forces and National Security

A Republican bill with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors

Last activity — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

In the other chamber's committee

Passed one chamber and has been handed to a committee in the other.

The committee decides whether it goes any further, and most bills that reach a committee never leave it. A committee that simply does nothing kills a bill without anyone ever voting against it, so no news from here is usually the news.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House voice vote
  3. In Senate committee

The House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together): no member's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This Act is titled the ``DHS Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program and Law Enforcement Support Act.'' It seeks to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002. The primary purpose is to establish the Intelligence Rotational Assignment Program. Specifically, it mandates that the Secretary require all DHS components within the Intelligence Enterprise to participate in the ODNI Intelligence Community Civilian Joint Duty Program. This program must be carried out according to policies set by the Director of National Intelligence.

Yes

  • Scored +5

    Does this tighten control of the border?

    The establishment of intelligence rotational assignments may enhance the efficiency and coordination of border security intelligence operations.

  • Scored +3

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill increases federal power by mandating participation in a joint program directed by the ODNI.

  • Scored +2

    Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?

    The program likely enhances the integration of intelligence capabilities within the DHS, potentially increasing domestic intelligence-gathering efficiency.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.