CONGRESS FOR VOTERS

Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ)

Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act

H.R. 1742 · House bill Armed Forces and National Security

A Democratic bill with 80 Democratic cosponsors · See all 80 cosponsors

Last activity — ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Houlahan asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1742, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.

Introduced, nothing more yet

Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.

Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced

What this bill would do

The Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act aims to establish specific leave policies for members of the Armed Forces and their dependents. It focuses on providing leave for non-covered reproductive health care, which includes abortion care and various assisted reproductive technologies. The bill requires leadership to treat this care as time-sensitive and approve leave accordingly. It also includes provisions for the reimbursement of travel-related costs when services are not available nearby. Additionally, the act emphasizes the privacy of the individual and prohibits any adverse actions for using these benefits.

Yes· 3 of 14

  • Scored +8

    Would women be better off under this?

    The bill protects reproductive autonomy and access to abortion and fertility care for women in the military.

  • Scored +8

    Does this make abortion easier to get?

    The bill ensures members can access abortion care through approved leave and reimbursement for travel and lodging.

  • Scored +8

    Does this protect people from being watched or searched?

    The bill prohibits commanders from requiring specific medical details and mandates privacy protections.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.