A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Safe Access to Cash Act of 2025," seeks to amend title 18 of the United States Code. It aims to clarify the legal definition of an ATM. The amendment defines an ATM as a network-connected terminal used for deposits, withdrawals, or balance inquiries. Crucially, it specifies that ATMs and the cash being moved into or out of them are considered to be in the care, custody, or control of a bank, credit union, or savings and loan. This applies regardless of whether the machine is on the institution's physical premises or owned by them.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +2
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill provides legal clarity regarding the possession of assets for financial institutions, which can help stabilize operational and legal frameworks.
- Scored +1
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Providing legal clarity for ATM assets helps maintain the stability of financial access points used by various income levels.
- Scored +1
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
The bill's clarification of financial asset possession supports the stability of banking infrastructure used by middle-income families.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Clarification of Asset Possession: Under Section 2, the bill establishes that an ATM and any cash in transit to or being loaded into/unloaded from it is considered in the care, custody, control, management, or possession of a financial institution. This applies regardless of whether the ATM is on the institution's physical premises or owned by them.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Providing legal clarity for ATM assets helps maintain the stability of financial access points used by various income levels. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill's clarification of financial asset possession supports the stability of banking infrastructure used by middle-income families. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Clarifying the legal status of network-connected ATMs helps ensure the legal framework surrounding common urban financial touchpoints is settled.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill provides legal clarity regarding the possession of assets for financial institutions, which can help stabilize operational and legal frameworks.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The clarification of legal definitions regarding the care and control of assets provides more legal certainty for judicial proceedings.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — By clarifying legal possession of ATMs, the bill provides more precise legal standards for law enforcement regarding ATM-related crimes.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Scott FitzgeraldRepublican · Wisconsin
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee