A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 163.
Waiting for a floor vote in the other chamber
Passed one chamber and is on the other chamber's calendar.
The calendar is a queue, not a date. The majority leadership decides what comes to the floor and when; much of what is placed on it is never called, and a bill that is never called simply expires with the Congress.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed House 409–15
- Awaiting Senate
- On Senate calendar
What this bill would do
The "Transparency In Charges for Key Events Ticketing Act," also known as the "TICKET Act," aims to increase transparency for consumers purchasing event tickets. It requires ticket issuers and secondary market sellers to clearly display the total ticket price, including all fees, from the start of the purchasing process. The bill bans speculative ticketing, which prohibits selling tickets that the issuer does not actually possess. It also mandates specific disclosures regarding resale status and prevents unauthorized use of venue names or affiliations. Additionally, the Act establishes strict refund requirements if an event is canceled or postponed. Finally, it empowers the Federal Trade Commission to enforce these rules and report on existing ticketing laws.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +7
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill mandates price transparency, bans speculative ticketing, and requires clear refund policies for consumers.
- Scored +4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill increases transparency in the ticketing market by requiring disclosures of total prices and resale status.
- Scored +3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill protects consumers from hidden fees and ensures they can receive refunds if an event is canceled.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not. Passed 409 yes · 15 no
04/29/2025 · Roll call 107 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Price Transparency: Ticket issuers must clearly and conspicuously display the total event ticket price, including all fees, at the time a ticket is first shown and throughout the entire purchase process. (Section 2)
-
Elimination of Speculative Sales: The bill prohibits sellers from offering event tickets for sale if they do not have actual or constructive possession of those tickets. (Section 3(a))
-
Clearer Information for Service Purchases: If a seller offers a service to obtain a ticket rather than the ticket itself, they must maintain a clear separation between the service and the ticket and disclose that the service does not guarantee a ticket. (Section 3(b))
-
Protection Against Misleading Affiliations: Sellers are prohibited from stating they are affiliated with or endorsed by a venue, team, or artist—such as using the word "official"—without express written consent or a partnership agreement. (Section 4(2))
-
Refund Security for Cancelled Events: If an event is cancelled, the purchaser is entitled to a full refund of the total event ticket price. (Section 5(a)(1))
-
Refund Options for Postponed Events: For events postponed for more than six months, purchasers can choose between a full refund or a replacement ticket for the rescheduled event. (Section 5(a)(3))
-
Mandatory Refund Disclosures: Sellers must clearly disclose their refund policy, including whether a refund includes event ticket fees, and explain how a purchaser can obtain a refund. (Section 5(b) and 5(c))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Service Limitations: While secondary market sellers can offer services to obtain tickets, they cannot market or list these services as actual event tickets. (Section 3(b)(1))
-
Refund Exceptions: If an event is canceled or postponed due to causes beyond the reasonable control of the issuer, such as a natural disaster or civil disturbance, the specific refund requirements listed in the Act do not apply. (Section 5(a))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill protects consumers from hidden fees and ensures they can receive refunds if an event is canceled. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill ensures predictable pricing by requiring all fees to be disclosed upfront. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill provides better consumer protections for residents attending large-scale live events in venues.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill mandates price transparency, bans speculative ticketing, and requires clear refund policies for consumers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases transparency in the ticketing market by requiring disclosures of total prices and resale status.
In the queue for a floor vote, with no date set
- 9/16/2025
- Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 163.
- 4/30/2025
- Received in the Senate.
- 4/29/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 409 - 15 (Roll no. 107). (text: 04/28/2025 CR H1640-1641)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 409 - 15 (Roll no. 107). (text: 04/28/2025 CR H1640-1641)
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1706)
- 4/28/2025
- At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1402.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1640)
- Mr. Bilirakis moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- 4/24/2025
- Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-66.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 43.
- 4/8/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
- 4/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois