Mark Amodei (R-NV)
Prior Approval Reform Act
A Republican bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Prior Approval Reform Act aims to change the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. It expands how trade associations can ask for contributions from stockholders and the executive or administrative staff of member corporations. This is done by removing the requirement for prior approval. These changes apply to solicitations made on or after January 1, 2025.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +4
Would business owners be better off under this?
Provides trade associations representing business owners more flexibility in fundraising.
- Scored +3
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
Simplifies the process for these individuals to be solicited for political contributions.
- Scored +3
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?
Simplifies the process for these individuals to be solicited for political contributions.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -5
Does this limit or expose the money behind campaigns?
Removes specific prior-approval restrictions on campaign contribution solicitations.
- Scored -4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
Decreases regulatory oversight of solicitation processes.
- Scored -3
Does this make elections run better?
Removes oversight requirements for how trade associations solicit political contributions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Expanded Solicitation Ability: Trade associations gain a broader ability to solicit contributions from stockholders and executive or administrative personnel of member corporations, as stated in Section 2(a).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Removal of Oversight: The bill removes the requirement for prior approval when trade associations solicit contributions from stockholders and executive or administrative personnel, according to Section 2(a).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Provides trade associations representing business owners more flexibility in fundraising. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Simplifies the process for these individuals to be solicited for political contributions. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Simplifies the process for these individuals to be solicited for political contributions. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Simplifies the process for these individuals to be solicited for political contributions. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Facilitates easier solicitation of contributions from stockholders and corporate executives.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — Expands the ability of trade associations to communicate solicitation requests. Does this limit or expose the money behind campaigns? — Removes specific prior-approval restrictions on campaign contribution solicitations. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Decreases regulatory oversight of solicitation processes. Does this make elections run better? — Removes oversight requirements for how trade associations solicit political contributions. Does this give the federal government more power? — Reduces federal oversight requirements for campaign solicitations. Does this limit the influence of paid lobbyists? — Potentially increases the ease of political fundraising for trade associations.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
- Introduced in House
Scott DesJarlaisRepublican · Tennessee
Ron EstesRepublican · Kansas