Lucy McBath (D-GA)
To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to direct the Secretary of Labor to award grants to community colleges for high-quality workforce development programs.
A Democratic bill with 30 Democratic cosponsors · See all 30 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes to amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to create a new grant program for community colleges. The Secretary of Labor would award competitive grants to eligible institutions to establish or expand high-quality workforce development programs. These programs are intended to help individuals earn recognized credentials for high-skill, high-wage, or in-demand industries. The bill authorizes up to $65,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2031. It requires institutions to form partnerships with employers to ensure training meets industry needs.
Yes· 3 of 14
- Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill prioritizes serving low-income individuals and can reduce unmet financial needs.
- Scored +6
Would students be better off under this?
The bill expands career services, financial support, and work-based learning for students.
- Scored +5
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The bill creates pathways for new entrants to the workforce via credentialing programs.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Expanded Educational Opportunities: The bill aims to establish, improve, or expand high-quality workforce development programs at community colleges (Section 1(a)(1)).
-
Increased Career Mobility: Individuals can obtain recognized postsecondary credentials that are stackable and portable across different regions or industries (Section 1(a)(2)).
-
Support for Vulnerable Populations: The Secretary may provide technical assistance and outreach to institutions serving low-income individuals, individuals with barriers to employment, and rural areas (Section 1(b)(2)(A)).
-
Priority for High-Need Individuals: Priority in awarding grants is given to institutions serving individuals with barriers to employment or incumbent workers needing to improve foundational skills (Section 1(d)(4)(A)).
-
Enhanced Career Services: Grant recipients are required to provide career services, which can include coaching, mentorship, and access to necessary course materials or technological devices (Section 1(e)(2)(B)).
-
Financial Assistance: Funds may be used to reduce or eliminate unmet financial needs related to the cost of attendance for program participants (Section 1(e)(3)(D)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Administrative Overhead: The Secretary may reserve up to two percent of the appropriated amounts for the administration of these grants (Section 1(b)(2)).
-
Institutional Restrictions: Eligible institutions are limited to using no more than 7 percent of their awarded funds for administrative costs (Section 1(e)(4)).
-
Equipment Spending Limits: While institutions can use funds to purchase or refurbish specialized equipment, this is capped at 15 percent of the total award (Section 1(e)(3)(C)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill prioritizes serving low-income individuals and can reduce unmet financial needs. Would students be better off under this? — The bill expands career services, financial support, and work-based learning for students. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill specifically includes support for Tribal Colleges and Universities. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill creates pathways for new entrants to the workforce via credentialing programs. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill helps businesses by creating a pipeline of skilled workers aligned with industry needs. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill provides technical assistance specifically for rural-serving institutions. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — The bill supports incumbent workers looking to improve their skills. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Improved workforce training can lead to higher wages for workers.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill promotes workforce development programs designed to prepare individuals for high-skill, in-demand industries. Is this likely to grow the economy? — By aligning workforce skills with industry demands, the bill aims to boost economic productivity.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make college cost less? — The bill allows funds to be used to reduce or eliminate unmet financial needs for program participants.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill targets low-income individuals by providing pathways to high-wage, in-demand industry sectors.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill includes provisions for technical assistance to support rural-serving institutions.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires annual reports and the publication of evaluation results on a public website.
- 8/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/13/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 4/1/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 2/7/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
4 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Shomari FiguresDemocrat · Alabama
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California